Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?
Date
Msg-id 45F1E799.5010205@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Put it another way: if anybody submitted a patch that does what VACUUM
> FULL does, coded in the way it is, it would never be applied, now.

Have an opinion do we? How about we just alias VACUUM FULL to cluster
and add the reporting stuff from VERBOSE?

Joshua D. Drake




-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring