Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD?
Date
Msg-id 87d52x2l4m.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> What's your point?

Apparently my point is that I should have checked the docs before assuming I
understood how this variable worked. I guess I've never needed to touch it
before.

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots