Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mario Weilguni
Subject Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Date
Msg-id 200703131642.36079.mweilguni@sime.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
List pgsql-hackers
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 16:38 schrieb Joshua D. Drake:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Albe Laurenz wrote:
> >> A fix could be either that the server checks escape sequences for
> >> validity
> >
> > This strikes me as essential. If the db has a certain encoding ISTM we
> > are promising that all the text data is valid for that encoding.
> >
> > The question in my mind is how we help people to recover from the fact
> > that we haven't done that.
>
> Is this any different than the issues of moving 8.0.x to 8.1 UTF8? Where
> we had to use iconv?
>

What issues? I've upgraded several 8.0 database to 8.1. without having to use
iconv. Did I miss something?

Regards,
Mario Weilguni


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Major Feature Interactions