Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Date
Msg-id 45F6C559.7060909@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Albe Laurenz wrote:
>> A fix could be either that the server checks escape sequences for
>> validity
>>   
> 
> This strikes me as essential. If the db has a certain encoding ISTM we
> are promising that all the text data is valid for that encoding.
> 
> The question in my mind is how we help people to recover from the fact
> that we haven't done that.

Is this any different than the issues of moving 8.0.x to 8.1 UTF8? Where
we had to use iconv?

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> 


-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Next
From: Mario Weilguni
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?