On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Sergey E. Koposov" <math@sai.msu.ru> writes:
>> I still don't understand how FS quotas can help with DB quotas. ..
>> All the FS quotas are setup for limiting the space for specific user and
>> specific mount point. AFAIK They do not allow to limit the space in one
>> directory. And since all the PG tablespaces will be owned by postgres
>> user, I dont think the FS quotas can do the job.
>
> Well, you have to put the tablespace on a mount point that's not
> otherwise used by Postgres, but beyond that I don't see the problem.
>
And if you have 5-10 users which should be under quota , you need 5-10
different mount points. From my humble opinion that's an absolutely crazy
solution and nobody will ever do that.
> The point here is not that it's amazingly simple or convenient to use;
> obviously it isn't. The point is that it's *possible* to get this sort
> of effect today, and so we have to ask whether it's really worth a good
> deal of development effort and code complexity to provide somewhat
> more convenient, but basically duplicate, functionality within Postgres.
>
Yes, I completely agree that it's up to the comunity to decide whether
the feature is worth the complexity of its development, but I don't agree
that's a duplication of existing functionality. IMHO.
regards, Sergey
*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Cambridge Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math@sai.msu.ru
