Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?
Date
Msg-id 15866.1172728258@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I've disabled packed varlenas for user-defined data types and find tsearch2
> and _int still fail. tsearch2 requires the small patch attached. _int seems to
> be unrelated.

As of when?  I committed fixes earlier tonight that seem to handle the
case of VARSIZE-is-ntohl.

The patch you suggest is orthogonal to what I did; it looks like it
might be right, but regression passes without it, so what was your test
case that led you to it?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mageshwaran
Date:
Subject: Re: POSTGRES WAL
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: POSTGRES WAL