Re: HOT - preliminary results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: HOT - preliminary results
Date
Msg-id 1172778684.3760.1332.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HOT - preliminary results  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: HOT - preliminary results  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 22:35 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>  > On 3/1/07, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>  >>
>  > seems pretty solid except for one possible problem...at one point when
>  > I dropped then later added the index on 'abalance', I got spammed
>  > 'WARNING:  found a HOT-updated tuple' from psql prompt.
> 
> Thats intentional. We don't yet support CREATE INDEX on a HOT-updated
> table. This is one of the major unfinished TODO items before we can
> consider patch feature complete. I have left the warning to catch
> this case till then.

CREATE INDEX and VACUUM FULL will require changes. Proposals for VACUUM
FULL have been posted, CREATE INDEX should be there tomorrow.

CLUSTER does not need changes for HOT, as things stand currently, mainly
because its MVCC behaviour is broken.

I've not looked in detail yet at the various ALTER TABLE modes, but will
do so in the next day or so.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2