Re: Patch queue concern - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Patch queue concern
Date
Msg-id 460BF801.4000309@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch queue concern  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> We don't want open-ended a few days before feature feeze.  We want them
> to be as done, at some complete stopping point, and submitted.
> 
>>> OK, but we don't want something that is ready to be committed, we need
>>> it complete.
>> So how many more releases before you think Postgres is "complete"? 
> 
> I am getting tired of your semantic games, here, Greg. I have no idea
> what you are trying to accomplish, but I have better things to do.

I have to concur here. Everyone is doing the best that they can. Greg, 
how about reviewing some patches?

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions
Next
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design