I wrote:
>> 2. I was annoyed repeatedly that some buildfarm members weren't
>> reporting log_archive_filenames entries, which forced going the long
>> way round in the process I was using. Seems like we need some more
>> proactive means for getting buildfarm owners to keep their script
>> versions up-to-date. Not sure what that should look like exactly,
>> as long as it's not "you can run an ancient version as long as you
>> please".
>>
>>
>>
>
> Modern clients report the versions of the two scripts involved (see
> script_version and web_script_version in reported config) so we could
> easily enforce a minimum version on these.
>
Meanwhile, the owner of the main 2 offending machines has said he will
upgrade them.
cheers
andrew
