Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3
Date
Msg-id 23826.1173758394@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3  (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3  (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In any case, I still haven't seen a good case made why a global work
>> queue will provide better behavior than each worker keeping a local
>> queue.

> If we have some external vacuum schedulers, we need to see and touch the
> content of work queue.

Who said anything about external schedulers?  I remind you that this is
AUTOvacuum.  If you want to implement manual scheduling you can still
use plain 'ol vacuum commands.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3