Re: Auto creation of Partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Auto creation of Partitions
Date
Msg-id DC6300EF-8866-43FE-89EC-A0EAA1EB2943@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto creation of Partitions  ("Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
Responses Re: Auto creation of Partitions  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>>> Since partition is inheritance-based, a simple DROP or  "NO
>> INHERIT"
>>> will do the job to deal with the partition. Do we want to reinvent
>>> additional syntax when these are around and are documented?
>>
>> Well, if the syntax for adding a new partition eventually
>> ends up as ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION, then it would make more
>> sense that you remove a partition via ALTER TABLE DROP PARTITION.
>
> But DROP PARTITION usually moves the data from this partition to other
> partitions,
> so it is something different.

It does? IIRC every partitioning system I've seen DROP PARTITION  
drops the data as well. It's up to you to move it somewhere else if  
you want to keep it.
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto creation of Partitions