Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Date
Msg-id 45F9179C.4040604@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Which is why we don't do things that way.  The code must fit within the
> general architecture before application -- particularly if it's an
> internal API change.  That's what the review process is for.

Yes, of course. As I've said, I have the time to work on this, but I 
need get the review process *started*. Otherwise I'll just tweak and 
polish the patch for weeks, and end up with something that gets rejected 
in the end anyway.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Next
From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: where to add/change commands