Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
Date
Msg-id 28102.1173165466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> An idea I've been thinking about would be to have the bgwriter or  
> some other background process actually try and keep the free list  
> populated,

The bgwriter already tries to keep pages "just in front" of the clock
sweep pointer clean.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD