David Fetter wrote:
> Per your earlier suggestion in IRC, I'm picturing a polymorphic
> function like
>
> pg_catalog.array_for(typepoid OID)
> pg_catalog.array_for(typename NAME)
> pg_catalog.array_for(typenamespace NAME, typename NAME)
>
> I don't see a good reason to allow putting array types in a different
> schema from their base types.
>
>
Actually, I think I prefer Martijns simple SQL extension suggestion better.
cheers
andrew
