Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 07:44 schrieb NikhilS:
> Sure, but as Chris mentioned earlier, wouldn't it be useful to maintain
> uniqueness on a
> partition-by-partition basis too?
Many things might be useful, but the aim of the "table partitioning" venture
is believed to be the provision of a transparent interface to the existing
do-it-yourself partitioning facilities. Therefore, the logical definition of
a table must continue to work unchanged (or alternatively, the use of the
feature must be prohibited if that cannot be guaranteed in a particular
case). Other features such as uniqueness on a partition basis might also be
useful but you can do that today and you don't need partitioning for that.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
