Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 April 2003

00:03 Re: GROUP BY + join regression in 7.3 Joe Conway
00:15 Re: optimizer cost calculation problem Ron Mayer
03:29 Re: GROUP BY + join regression in 7.3 Tom Lane
04:23 Re: GROUP BY + join regression in 7.3 Joe Conway
06:03 Re: GROUP BY + join regression in 7.3 Manfred Koizar
08:54 Re: 7.3.2 make failed on AIX4.3 using native c compiler Justin Clift
10:01 Re: CVS Access Dave Page
10:19 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? mlw
10:34 View definition formatting Dave Page
11:12 Re: View definition formatting Jan Wieck
13:00 Re: GROUP BY + join regression in 7.3 Tom Lane
13:36 Re: View definition formatting Tom Lane
13:37 Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). Merlin Moncure
14:14 Re: optimizer cost calculation problem scott.marlowe
14:24 Re: optimizer cost calculation problem Tom Lane
15:32 Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
15:38 Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
15:41 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Steve Wampler
15:57 Re: View definition formatting Dave Page
16:08 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Andrew Dunstan
16:29 Re: View definition formatting Peter Eisentraut
16:45 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? pgsql@mohawksoft.com
17:18 Re: View definition formatting Tom Lane
17:50 Re: View definition formatting Robert Treat
17:58 Re: View definition formatting Tom Lane
18:21 Re: View definition formatting Rod Taylor
19:21 contrib and licensing mlw
19:27 Re: updateable cursors & visibility Hiroshi Inoue
19:29 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). Merlin Moncure
19:31 Re: contrib and licensing Rod Taylor
19:40 Re: 7.3.2 make failed on AIX4.3 using native c compiler Peter Eisentraut
19:41 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Peter Eisentraut
21:33 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
22:37 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? mlw
23:32 Re: View definition formatting Christopher Kings-Lynne

2 April 2003

07:56 Re: View definition formatting Dave Page
08:30 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Hannu Krosing
10:45 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? mlw
12:30 mariposa Moritz Sinn
12:54 Re: updateable cursors & visibility Gavin Sherry
12:59 Re: updateable cursors & visibility Tom Lane
13:15 Re: 7.3.2 make failed on AIX4.3 using native c compiler John Liu
13:34 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). Merlin Moncure
17:02 Re: optimizer cost calculation problem Andrew Sullivan
18:01 Re: 7.4devel auth failed Tom Lane
18:03 Re: 7.4devel auth failed Bruce Momjian
18:07 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). Jan Wieck
18:18 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). Bruce Momjian
18:26 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
18:35 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Bruce Momjian
18:37 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
18:39 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Andrew Sullivan
18:44 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Kevin Brown
18:55 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Kevin Brown
19:07 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Jason Earl
19:18 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
19:32 TODO list problem or am I way off base? Frank Wiles
19:39 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Peter Eisentraut
19:41 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Peter Eisentraut
19:52 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). Merlin Moncure
19:53 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Hannu Krosing
20:04 Re: contrib and licensing mlw
20:21 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? mlw
20:25 Re: contrib and licensing Marc G. Fournier
20:27 Re: contrib and licensing scott.marlowe
20:45 Re: TODO list problem or am I way off base? Bruce Momjian
20:45 Re: contrib and licensing scott.marlowe
20:59 Re: contrib and licensing Peter Eisentraut
21:00 Re: contrib and licensing Marc G. Fournier
21:01 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
21:11 Re: contrib and licensing Dann Corbit
21:12 Re: contrib and licensing Neil Conway
21:16 More protocol discussion: breaking down query processing Tom Lane
22:10 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
23:57 Re: contrib and licensing Lamar Owen

3 April 2003

00:59 Re: contrib and licensing Stephan Szabo
01:33 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Andrew Sullivan
01:40 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
02:10 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
02:36 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Bruce Momjian
02:36 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Christopher Kings-Lynne
02:37 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Alvaro Herrera
02:46 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
02:56 Re: contrib and licensing Lamar Owen
03:10 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
03:32 Re: contrib and licensing Lamar Owen
03:37 Re: contrib and licensing Lamar Owen
06:22 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Hannu Krosing
07:02 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect).
10:26 Re: contrib and licensing Jan Wieck
10:27 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? mlw
10:39 Re: contrib and licensing mlw
10:45 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
10:55 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
11:30 Re: contrib and licensing mlw
12:26 Re: contrib and licensing Jan Wieck
12:29 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
12:55 can't create database John Liu
13:05 Re: can't create database Christoph Haller
13:07 Re: can't create database John Liu
13:21 more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
13:23 Re: can't create database Tom Lane
13:32 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? Jason M. Felice
13:34 Re: contrib and licensing pgsql@mohawksoft.com
13:54 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
13:54 Re: contrib and licensing Jan Wieck
14:07 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
14:26 Re: contrib and licensing pgsql@mohawksoft.com
14:39 Re: contrib and licensing Lamar Owen
14:47 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane
15:01 Re: 7.4devel auth failed Andreas Pflug
15:06 SQL Query to get Column constraints Steve
15:06 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT Olleg Samojlov
15:06 gmake does not finish on default slackware 9 (or 8.1) install Andrew Gemmell
15:06 Re: Newbie: problem Connecting to Server Ferindo Middleton Jr
15:06 Newbie: problem Connecting to Server Ferindo Middleton Jr
15:06 config file, where is it Ferindo Middleton Jr
15:07 Re: [GENERAL] Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem Lincoln Yeoh
15:07 Re: [GENERAL] Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem Dennis Gearon
15:12 Re: [GENERAL] Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem Lincoln Yeoh
15:17 Re: contrib and licensing Marc G. Fournier
15:59 OSS database needed for testing Josh Berkus
15:59 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT Tom Lane
16:05 Re: more contrib: log rotator Jim Buttafuoco
16:09 Re: OSS database needed for testing Merlin Moncure
16:12 Re: SQL Query to get Column constraints Tom Lane
16:15 Re: OSS database needed for testing pgsql@mohawksoft.com
16:16 Re: gmake does not finish on default slackware 9 (or 8.1) install Tom Lane
16:27 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Peter Eisentraut
16:32 Re: gmake does not finish on default slackware 9 (or 8.1) Peter Eisentraut
16:41 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
17:12 Re: more contrib: log rotator Dave Cramer
17:39 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
19:02 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Bruno Wolff III
19:12 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
19:14 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
19:47 Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Tom Lane
20:07 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing mlw
20:20 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Bruno Wolff III
20:32 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Andrew Sullivan
21:23 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Vincent van Leeuwen
21:40 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
21:47 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Vincent van Leeuwen

4 April 2003

01:00 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
09:01 [OT][ANNOUNCEMENT]Announcing first public release of Open Application Server Shridhar Daithankar
09:43 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
12:25 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT Tom Lane
12:38 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT Bruce Momjian
13:12 Re: more contrib: log rotator Peter Eisentraut
14:09 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Josh Berkus
14:20 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
14:35 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
14:37 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
14:45 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Merlin Moncure
14:52 .sequence_name != ? Ed L.
15:04 Re: more contrib: log rotator Ed L.
15:06 Re: more contrib: log rotator Ed L.
15:13 Re: more contrib: log rotator Jan Wieck
15:14 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
15:19 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
15:24 Re: .sequence_name != ? Tom Lane
15:37 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Josh Berkus
15:57 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Merlin Moncure
16:10 Re: more contrib: log rotator Ed L.
16:27 Re: .sequence_name != ? Ed L.
16:45 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
16:58 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
17:08 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Lamar Owen
17:10 Re: more contrib: log rotator Ed L.
17:17 Build error in cvs head Manfred Koizar
17:20 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Merlin Moncure
17:27 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Josh Berkus
17:30 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Lamar Owen
17:51 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Merlin Moncure
17:53 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
17:57 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Lamar Owen
18:13 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
18:17 Re: [PERFORM] OSS database needed for testing Josh Berkus
19:21 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
19:45 Re: more contrib: log rotator Ed L.
20:38 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
20:42 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
20:46 Re: Deadlock while doing VACUUM?? Kevin Brown
20:55 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
21:27 Re: Deadlock while doing VACUUM?? Tom Lane
21:34 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Kurt Roeckx
21:37 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Tom Lane
22:01 Re: more contrib: log rotator Peter Eisentraut
22:22 Re: more contrib: log rotator Tom Lane
23:52 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Kevin Brown

5 April 2003

01:57 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT Barry Lind
02:13 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Tom Lane
10:34 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Kurt Roeckx
12:13 Separate build directory Manfred Koizar
12:23 Re: more contrib: log rotator Jon Jensen
15:12 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Tom Lane
16:10 Re: [NOVICE] Timestamp with time zone change (error) in 7.3.2? Tom Lane
17:14 compile error in cvs tip Joe Conway
17:53 Re: compile error in cvs tip Bruce Momjian
17:56 Re: compile error in cvs tip Joe Conway

6 April 2003

11:29 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Kurt Roeckx
15:50 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch Tom Lane
20:02 Re: more contrib: log rotator Peter Eisentraut
20:49 Re: more contrib: log rotator Giles Lean
21:17 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
21:30 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Andrew Sullivan
21:41 Re: more contrib: log rotator Peter Eisentraut
21:54 Re: more contrib: log rotator Andrew Sullivan
21:58 Re: contrib and licensing Kevin Brown
22:58 Re: contrib and licensing Tom Lane

7 April 2003

00:39 Re: contrib and licensing Kevin Brown
01:36 I am away this week Bruce Momjian
02:38 psql improvements Christopher Kings-Lynne
02:50 Re: psql improvements Alvaro Herrera
03:40 Errors uniquely identified A.M.
05:08 HP-UX 11.22 (IA64) IPF Patch for PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Shinji Teragaito
05:32 Re: HP-UX 11.22 (IA64) IPF Patch for PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Tom Lane
06:01 Re: contrib and licensing Michael Paesold
07:35 Incorrect expected rows by ANALYZE Kenji Sugita
07:59 Re: contrib and licensing Hannu Krosing
09:33 Postgresql & AMD x86-64 Justin Clift
12:48 Question abour PostgreSQL Michael Meskes
13:19 Re: Incorrect expected rows by ANALYZE Tom Lane
14:08 pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 Dave Page
14:09 Re: Incorrect expected rows by ANALYZE pgsql@mohawksoft.com
14:36 Re: Incorrect expected rows by ANALYZE scott.marlowe
14:39 Re: more contrib: log rotator scott.marlowe
14:40 Re: Incorrect expected rows by ANALYZE Tom Lane
14:45 Re: more contrib: log rotator Lamar Owen
15:22 Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution? Ron Peacetree
15:22 Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
15:22 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
15:22 information_schema 7.4 Andreas Pflug
16:03 Re: information_schema 7.4 Rod Taylor
16:05 Re: more contrib: log rotator Peter Eisentraut
16:11 Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution? Rod Taylor
16:41 Re: more contrib: log rotator cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
18:36 Re: No merge sort? Greg Stark
18:39 pg_trigger.tgtype question Brian
18:44 Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
18:48 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
18:58 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
19:00 Re: Incorrect expected rows by ANALYZE Kevin Brown
19:08 Re: [INTERFACES] More protocol discussion: breaking down query processing Greg Stark
19:20 Re: No merge sort? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
19:25 Re: No merge sort? Jason M. Felice
19:34 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
19:39 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
19:50 Re: No merge sort? Greg Stark
19:51 FK deadlock problem addressed Jan Wieck
19:52 Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Jan Wieck
19:58 Re: No merge sort? Steve Wampler
20:00 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
20:02 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
21:06 Re: No merge sort? Greg Stark
21:26 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
23:02 Re: [GENERAL] Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Tom Lane

8 April 2003

00:19 Re: pg_trigger.tgtype question Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:24 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:36 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Tatsuo Ishii
01:13 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Stephan Szabo
09:25 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Jan Wieck
11:20 Re: HP-UX 11.22 (IA64) IPF Patch for PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Peter Eisentraut
11:40 Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA mlw
12:19 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Marc G. Fournier
12:53 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Jan Wieck
13:22 win32 broke unix Patrick Welche
13:25 Re: [GENERAL] Casting Tom Lane
13:33 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA Jan Wieck
14:00 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA pgsql@mohawksoft.com
14:13 Re: [GENERAL] Casting Nigel J. Andrews
14:16 Re: [GENERAL] Casting Tom Lane
14:21 Re: win32 broke unix Tom Lane
14:24 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
15:35 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA Dustin Sallings
17:59 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
18:15 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
18:15 pg_get_viewdef 7.4 et al Andreas Pflug
18:15 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
18:15 Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution? Ron Peacetree
18:15 A funny story about horology regression test failures... Brian E. Pangburn
18:15 Re: [GENERAL] FK deadlock problem addressed Dennis Gearon
18:15 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
18:15 Re: [NOVICE] Timestamp with time zone change (error) in 7.3.2? Doug Silver
18:15 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
18:15 pg_get_viewdef 7.4 parentheses Andreas Pflug
18:37 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
18:55 Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase Neil Conway
19:20 Re: More protocol discussion: breaking down query processing Joe Conway
19:23 Bit Filters ... Carles Beltran Vazquez
20:08 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA Josh Berkus
21:29 Re: Complex database for testing, U.S. Census Tiger/UA Merlin Moncure
22:05 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Andrew Sullivan
22:27 Re: pg_get_viewdef 7.4 parentheses Tom Lane
22:53 Re: HP-UX 11.22 (IA64) IPF Patch for PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Shinji Teragaito

9 April 2003

02:58 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Tom Lane
03:14 Re: pg_get_viewdef 7.4 et al Tom Lane
04:05 Re: [INTERFACES] More protocol discussion: breaking down query processing Tom Lane
04:46 Re: [INTERFACES] More protocol discussion: breaking down Joe Conway
13:14 Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase Jan Wieck
13:20 Re: pg_get_viewdef 7.4 et al Tom Lane
13:48 Question about simple function folding optimization Stephan Szabo
14:00 Re: pg_get_viewdef 7.4 et al Tom Lane
14:42 [OT][Announce] Availability of OAS Server pakcages Shridhar Daithankar
14:43 pg_dump and indexes John Liu
14:54 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Tom Lane
14:58 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Joe Conway
15:00 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Tom Lane
15:13 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
15:13 Re: pg_get_viewdef 7.4 et al Andreas Pflug
15:13 RedHat 9 & 7.2.4 Al Sutton
15:13 How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Stu Krone
15:13 Bit Filters Carles Beltran Vazquez
15:13 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
15:37 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Nigel J. Andrews
15:48 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Tom Lane
16:07 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Bruno Wolff III
16:09 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Andrew Sullivan
16:24 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Tom Lane
16:53 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
16:54 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
21:30 More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane

10 April 2003

07:01 Re: Bit Filters Hannu Krosing
08:02 Re: Bit Filters Sailesh Krishnamurthy
08:03 Charset encoding and accents Davide Romanini
08:07 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Peter Galbavy
11:19 Re: Charset encoding and accents Thomas O'Dowd
11:49 Test databases mlw
12:13 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Jan Wieck
12:57 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
13:10 building docs from cvs Dave Cramer
14:55 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Steve Crawford
15:38 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
15:52 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Hannu Krosing
15:56 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Hannu Krosing
15:59 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
16:17 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Hannu Krosing
16:51 Re: Charset encoding and accents Barry Lind
16:51 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Barry Lind
17:15 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
19:30 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Jan Wieck
20:19 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Barry Lind
21:04 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
21:50 Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Tom Lane

11 April 2003

00:16 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Sean Chittenden
01:43 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Tom Lane
01:58 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Sean Chittenden
02:05 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Tom Lane
02:12 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Christopher Kings-Lynne
02:18 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Curt Sampson
02:22 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Sean Chittenden
02:28 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Rod Taylor
09:57 Integration with Access Method interface Alice Lottini
12:22 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Peter Eisentraut
13:17 Re: Integration with Access Method interface Tom Lane
13:38 Re: Question about simple function folding optimization Tom Lane
13:41 Re: Charset encoding and accents Davide Romanini
14:12 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation scott.marlowe
14:24 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Tom Lane
14:44 Re: Integration with Access Method interface Alice Lottini
15:29 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
16:19 Re: Integration with Access Method interface Jan Wieck
16:52 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
16:52 Re: OLE DB PostgreSQL provider ldholtsclaw
16:52 Does libpq have SSL functions? gar8@pitt.edu (Tony Reina)
16:52 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
16:54 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
16:54 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
16:55 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Stu Krone
16:55 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Ron Peacetree
16:56 Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase Ron Peacetree
18:35 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? scott.marlowe
19:36 Re: [GENERAL] medical image on postgreSQL? Sean Chittenden
19:51 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
19:58 Re: [GENERAL] medical image on postgreSQL? scott.marlowe
20:16 Re: [GENERAL] medical image on postgreSQL? Sean Chittenden
20:33 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Kevin Brown
21:04 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Nigel J. Andrews
22:06 Re: [GENERAL] medical image on postgreSQL? Greg Stark
22:21 backend dies when C function calls C++ library that throws an exception David Blasby
22:44 Re: [GENERAL] medical image on postgreSQL? Sean Chittenden
22:54 Re: backend dies when C function calls C++ library that throws an exception Tom Lane

12 April 2003

00:50 Re: [BUGS] Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW to UTF-8 doesn't Tatsuo Ishii
03:10 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Curt Sampson
04:26 Re: Speed of SSL connections; cost of renegotiation Tom Lane
05:41 OT: cvsup for Red Hat 9 or rsync cvs Joe Conway
05:50 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Shridhar Daithankar
09:54 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Kevin Brown
10:09 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Shridhar Daithankar
14:00 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Greg Stark
14:01 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
15:00 Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL Lamar Owen
17:50 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Michael Paesold
18:29 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Neil Conway
19:08 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Michael Paesold
20:28 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Jan Wieck
20:55 Re: Charset encoding and accents Barry Lind
21:49 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Mark Kirkwood
22:21 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Greg Stark

13 April 2003

00:09 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Tom Lane
03:04 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Mark Kirkwood
03:16 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Kevin Brown
03:31 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Kevin Brown
04:20 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Greg Stark
05:11 CVSup binary RPMs for Red Hat 9 available Joe Conway
05:29 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Shridhar Daithankar
05:42 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Shridhar Daithankar
13:01 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Jan Wieck
14:16 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Jan Wieck
14:26 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Jan Wieck
14:45 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Tom Lane
18:33 Conformance of PostgreSQL to ANSI/ISO Standard J M Sykes
18:34 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
18:45 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Hannu Krosing
18:54 Re: Conformance of PostgreSQL to ANSI/ISO Standard Mike Mascari
19:17 Re: Conformance of PostgreSQL to ANSI/ISO Standard Mike Mascari
19:28 PostgreSQL on a Cluster Devrim GUNDUZ
23:08 minor bug with latest flex Neil Conway
23:26 compile warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway

14 April 2003

00:37 Re: PostgreSQL on a Cluster cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
02:10 Re: compile warnings in CVS HEAD Tom Lane
02:37 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Tom Lane
06:23 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Mark Kirkwood
10:21 Anyone in Brisbane, Australia, and decent with Linux & PostgreSQL? Justin Clift
11:29 Recovery tools mlw
13:25 Re: Recovery tools Tom Lane
14:59 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
14:59 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Stu Krone
14:59 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
14:59 Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL Bob Kline
15:00 Re: [BUGS] Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW to UTF-8 doesn'twork Enke, Michael
15:00 Re: No merge sort? Ron Peacetree
15:00 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Stu Krone
15:08 MySQL and RHDB news; 8.0 troll Ned Lilly
15:19 internal time format justin
15:23 Re: No merge sort? terr@terralogic.net
15:38 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Peter Eisentraut
15:52 Re: No merge sort? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
15:53 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? John Gray
16:00 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Tom Lane
17:42 undefined reference to `is_absolute_path' Joe Conway
17:48 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? Andrew Sullivan
18:16 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL on a Cluster Andrew Sullivan
19:42 Re: undefined reference to `is_absolute_path' Tom Lane
19:51 Re: undefined reference to `is_absolute_path' Joe Conway
19:56 Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
20:22 Re: internal time format Tom Lane
21:37 Are we losing momentum? Bruce Momjian
22:54 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
23:19 Re: Are we losing momentum? Gavin Sherry
23:29 Re: Are we losing momentum? Kevin Brown
23:32 Tuning heuristics Bruce Badger
23:34 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Kevin Brown
23:38 Re: Are we losing momentum? Gavin Sherry

15 April 2003

00:36 Re: Are we losing momentum? Larry Rosenman
00:51 Re: Are we losing momentum? Brent Verner
01:14 Re: Are we losing momentum? Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:23 Re: [BUGS] Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW to Tatsuo Ishii
01:24 Re: Are we losing momentum? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
01:35 Re: Are we losing momentum? Curt Sampson
01:47 Re: No merge sort? Dann Corbit
01:48 Re: Tuning heuristics greg@turnstep.com
01:48 Re: Are we losing momentum? Bruce Momjian
01:49 Re: Are we losing momentum? Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:51 Re: Are we losing momentum? Mike Mascari
01:58 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Bruce Momjian
02:12 Re: Are we losing momentum? Christopher Browne
02:22 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sailesh Krishnamurthy
02:53 Re: Are we losing momentum? Jeff Hoffmann
03:03 Re: win32 broke unix Bruce Momjian
03:15 tsearch V2 doc needed Oleg Bartunov
03:23 Re: [OpenFTS-general] tsearch V2 doc needed Oleg Bartunov
03:30 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dann Corbit
03:41 Re: Are we losing momentum? Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:46 Re: Are we losing momentum? Ron Mayer
03:55 Re: Are we losing momentum? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
04:05 Re: Are we losing momentum? Jeff Davis
04:20 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dann Corbit
04:49 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Tom Lane
05:08 Re: Are we losing momentum? Shridhar Daithankar
05:10 Re: Are we losing momentum? Oliver Elphick
05:40 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
08:10 Re: Are we losing momentum? Kevin Brown
08:18 Re: Recovery tools Hannu Krosing
08:28 Re: Are we losing momentum? Curt Sampson
08:45 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Michael Paesold
09:39 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dave Page
09:44 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dave Page
10:51 Re: Are we losing momentum? mlw
11:06 Re: Are we losing momentum? mlw
11:08 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tatsuo Ishii
11:12 Re: Recovery tools mlw
11:39 PostgreSQL vs. MySQL in Japan (was: Are we losing momentum?) Ned Lilly
12:04 Кузьмина-Вакилова Елена
12:22 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Peter Eisentraut
12:38 qualified column names Dave Cramer
13:03 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
13:17 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Tom Lane
13:18 call analyze from stored procedure in C Ulli Mueckstein
13:19 Re: Are we losing momentum? Robert Treat
13:25 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
13:35 GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
14:49 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Robert Treat
15:25 Re: Are we losing momentum? scott.marlowe
15:36 Re: Are we losing momentum? Kurt Roeckx
15:44 Re: Are we losing momentum? Lamar Owen
15:50 Re: Are we losing momentum? Bruce Momjian
15:52 Re: Are we losing momentum? Bruce Momjian
15:55 Re: Are we losing momentum? Bruce Momjian
16:23 Re: Are we losing momentum? Steve Wampler
16:25 Re: Are we losing momentum? John Liu
16:30 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
16:44 Re: Are we losing momentum? Rob Butler
16:44 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
16:59 Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? Jan Wieck
17:29 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
17:50 Re: Are we losing momentum? Robert Treat
17:56 Re: Are we losing momentum? Mike Benoit
18:12 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
18:17 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
18:20 Re: Are we losing momentum? Oliver Elphick
18:24 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dann Corbit
18:36 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
18:36 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
18:40 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dann Corbit
19:28 Re: Are we losing momentum? Neil Conway
19:37 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Bruce Momjian
19:43 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
20:19 Re: Does libpq have SSL functions? Bruce Momjian
20:50 Re: Are we losing momentum? Michael Paesold
20:58 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
21:04 Re: Does libpq have SSL functions? Bruce Momjian
21:11 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Bruce Momjian
21:15 Re: Are we losing momentum? Ron Mayer
21:17 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
21:21 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Bruce Momjian
21:23 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
21:26 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dann Corbit
21:36 Transaction problem? Kurt Roeckx
21:47 Re: Are we losing momentum? Robert E. Bruccoleri
22:07 Foreign Database Connectivity mlw
22:08 First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Tom Lane
22:18 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
22:19 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Tom Lane
22:23 Re: Transaction problem? Tom Lane
22:28 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
22:39 Re: Transaction problem? Kurt Roeckx
22:51 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
22:56 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
23:09 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Rob Butler
23:13 Re: Are we losing momentum? Rob Butler
23:28 Re: Are we losing momentum? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com

16 April 2003

00:00 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sailesh Krishnamurthy
00:08 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tatsuo Ishii
00:33 encoding question Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:38 Re: Transaction problem? Doug McNaught
01:07 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity mlw
02:08 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Alvaro Herrera
02:18 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Bruce Momjian
02:25 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Neil Conway
02:32 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Alvaro Herrera
02:59 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tatsuo Ishii
03:20 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
04:02 Testing the return value of fclose() in the backend Gavin Sherry
04:24 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Grant Finnemore
04:42 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL in Japan Tatsuo Ishii
04:57 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Tom Lane
05:10 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
05:11 Re: encoding question Tom Lane
06:20 Re: Are we losing momentum? Shridhar Daithankar
06:45 Re: How do you execute a postgresql function from perl? Tommi Maekitalo
06:55 Re: Are we losing momentum? Shridhar Daithankar
08:13 Re: Transaction problem? Hannu Krosing
08:17 Re: Are we losing momentum? Hannu Krosing
10:45 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Patrick Welche
11:20 Re: Are we losing momentum? ow
12:01 DBLink cursors Shridhar Daithankar
12:14 One more question regarding dblink Shridhar Daithankar
12:19 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Jason M. Felice
12:45 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Peter Eisentraut
12:51 Re: Are we losing momentum? greg@turnstep.com
13:06 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Tom Lane
13:10 cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Rob Butler
13:16 Re: Are we losing momentum? Shridhar Daithankar
13:16 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias Tom Lane
13:17 Re: Are we losing momentum? Hannu Krosing
13:20 pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page
13:23 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Tom Lane
13:25 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Shridhar Daithankar
14:05 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Tom Lane
14:22 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Tom Lane
14:31 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Rob Butler
14:33 Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Rob Butler
14:42 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
14:45 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
14:51 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page
15:13 Re: DBLink cursors Joe Conway
15:19 Re: One more question regarding dblink Joe Conway
15:22 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Robert Treat
15:22 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Joe Conway
15:23 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Darko Prenosil
15:33 Re: Are we losing momentum? Robert E. Bruccoleri
15:39 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Rob Butler
15:40 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Joe Conway
15:47 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Rob Butler
16:29 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
16:35 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) Tom Lane
16:39 Re: encoding question Peter Eisentraut
16:42 Redhat DB differences Rob Butler
16:44 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
16:55 Re: Redhat DB differences Tom Lane
16:58 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Bruce Momjian
17:32 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Robert Treat
17:50 anyone here follow securityfocus.com? Robert Treat
17:51 Re: Transaction problem? Kurt Roeckx
18:00 Re: anyone here follow securityfocus.com? Lamar Owen
18:27 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity mlw
18:39 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
18:42 Re: Transaction problem? Tom Lane
19:02 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Tom Lane
19:55 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Rob Butler
20:03 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Joe Conway
20:07 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity Joe Conway
20:44 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") greg@turnstep.com
20:50 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for Bruce Badger
21:47 Re: Are we losing momentum? Ron Mayer

17 April 2003

00:20 Re: encoding question Tatsuo Ishii
00:20 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tatsuo Ishii
00:42 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Kevin Brown
00:56 Re: One more question regarding dblink Kevin Brown
01:03 Re: DBLink cursors Kevin Brown
01:05 Re: One more question regarding dblink Joe Conway
01:19 Re: DBLink cursors Joe Conway
01:26 Re: DBLink cursors Joe Conway
01:35 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Kevin Brown
01:39 Re: DBLink cursors Kevin Brown
02:01 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
02:05 Re: One more question regarding dblink Kevin Brown
02:10 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
02:21 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Alvaro Herrera
02:39 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Tom Lane
05:53 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Kevin Brown
05:54 New flex Oliver Elphick
06:27 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page
06:32 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page
06:40 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page
06:45 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page
07:00 Re: DBLink cursors Shridhar Daithankar
07:02 Re: One more question regarding dblink Shridhar Daithankar
08:43 For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ben Clewett
09:01 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page
10:35 Re: Are we losing momentum? Nigel J. Andrews
10:42 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ben Clewett
11:15 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ian Barwick
11:18 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Andrew Dunstan
11:44 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page
11:44 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Andrew Sullivan
11:55 Re: Are we losing momentum? Ian Barwick
12:56 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Tom Lane
13:14 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Tom Lane
13:35 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
14:19 qualified column names Dave Cramer
14:26 Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page
14:37 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian
15:38 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Doug McNaught
15:40 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian
16:38 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Jon Jensen
16:40 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Peter Eisentraut
16:41 FE/BE Protocol, Tom? pgsql@mohawksoft.com
16:45 Re: FE/BE Protocol, Tom? Rod Taylor
17:46 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Matthew T. O'Connor
20:06 Should libpq's environment settings affect the session default? Tom Lane
20:15 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables Kevin Brown
20:16 Re: Should libpq's environment settings affect the session Bruce Momjian
21:23 Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Tom Lane

18 April 2003

01:07 pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Thomas O'Dowd
01:44 Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Thomas O'Dowd
03:56 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Kevin Brown
04:07 Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Oliver Elphick
04:11 Foreign key performance Kevin Brown
04:30 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
04:49 Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
04:56 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
05:03 Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Tom Lane
05:06 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane
05:20 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Kevin Brown
05:25 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
05:37 Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Thomas O'Dowd
08:58 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Kevin Brown
11:32 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
11:40 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
13:06 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
13:47 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
13:48 default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Using index for "like 'ABC%'" type query) Tom Lane
13:51 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane
14:07 Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Bruce Momjian
14:13 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
17:22 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page
19:37 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Kevin Brown
21:06 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Kevin Brown
21:41 Re: default locale considered harmful? Tatsuo Ishii
23:12 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane

19 April 2003

01:53 There are advantages to having an odd name Tom Lane
03:21 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Christopher Kings-Lynne
04:22 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian
04:27 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
04:35 relID and tupleID S -
04:49 Re: relID and tupleID Tom Lane
05:07 Re: relID and tupleID S -
08:22 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Christopher Kings-Lynne
08:23 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Christopher Kings-Lynne
10:00 Problem while ordering Turkish chars Devrim GUNDUZ
12:31 Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol mlw
14:33 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
14:34 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian
14:49 Re: Problem while ordering Turkish chars Tom Lane
15:01 Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Tom Lane
18:03 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
19:58 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane
21:35 Priority queue of tuples in PostgreSQL source code. You Lun

20 April 2003

01:39 rename/unlink handling for Win32 Bruce Momjian
01:47 Re: rename/unlink handling for Win32 Bruce Momjian
05:56 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
08:06 Re: How to write make rules for shared library and Cadili
15:04 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo
15:14 Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Peter Eisentraut
15:15 Re: rename/unlink handling for Win32 Peter Eisentraut
15:55 Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Using index for "like 'ABC%'" type query) Andrew Sullivan
16:09 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane
16:41 Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Tom Lane
17:18 Re: New flex Tom Lane
23:09 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Kevin Brown
23:35 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane

21 April 2003

04:17 TODO-list Dennis Björklund
05:25 Re: TODO-list Tom Lane
08:18 new version of tsearch V2 Oleg Bartunov
09:46 Re: TODO-list Dennis Björklund
12:48 Dr. Codd Greg Sabino Mullane
13:05 Re: TODO-list Hannu Krosing
13:06 Re: TODO-list Hannu Krosing
14:37 Re: Are we losing momentum? scott.marlowe
14:45 Re: Are we losing momentum? Shridhar Daithankar
14:45 Re: Are we losing momentum? Steve Wampler
15:47 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") scott.marlowe
16:08 Re: Are we losing momentum? Neil Conway
16:47 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 scott.marlowe
19:32 Re: Are we losing momentum? scott.marlowe
20:47 Re: Are we losing momentum? Neil Conway
21:48 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sander Steffann

22 April 2003

00:18 Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Christopher Browne
00:21 Re: [INTERFACES] Speed of SSL connections; cost of rise
01:23 Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:44 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Neil Conway
01:57 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Larry Rosenman
02:00 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane
02:10 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:24 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden
03:27 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Larry Rosenman
03:37 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane
03:44 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden
03:48 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Larry Rosenman
04:04 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane
04:10 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden
04:15 The main 'main() ' of postgresql. S -
04:19 CLOSE command tag Neil Conway
04:20 Re: The main 'main() ' of postgresql. Neil Conway
04:46 Re: CLOSE command tag Tom Lane
05:00 FYI: away for the summer Neil Conway
05:01 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden
05:10 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane
05:20 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden
05:44 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Philip Warner
07:22 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ben Clewett
07:38 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Shridhar Daithankar
08:31 Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Nigel J. Andrews
10:44 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Kevin Brown
10:48 bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
11:23 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing Matthew T. O'Connor
12:09 Re: CLOSE command tag Peter Eisentraut
13:29 Re: For the ametures. (related to 'Are we losing momentum?') pgsql@mohawksoft.com
13:31 Re: TODO-list Andrew Overholt
13:32 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne
13:36 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Stephan Szabo
14:12 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tilo Schwarz
14:18 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
14:31 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane
14:51 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
15:08 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane
15:19 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
15:32 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") D'Arcy J.M. Cain
15:51 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane
16:24 Re: Are we losing momentum? scott.marlowe
18:34 Re: There are advantages to having an odd name Hannu Krosing
18:37 Re: There are advantages to having an odd name Bruce Momjian
19:21 elog/ereport syntax difficulties Tom Lane
22:39 Re: Are we losing momentum? scott.marlowe
22:46 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dann Corbit

23 April 2003

00:12 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:15 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:28 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
00:30 Re: CLOSE command tag Neil Conway
02:34 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Stephan Szabo
03:14 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane
03:40 Re: Are we losing momentum? Andrew Dunstan
05:16 Re: Are we losing momentum? Shridhar Daithankar
07:30 7.4 acl: what is a*r*w*d*? Andreas Pflug
07:37 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") D'Arcy J.M. Cain
09:49 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
10:14 pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - The Conclusion Dave Page
10:39 linking problem with gcc-mingw Shi-Sen Chang
11:32 Re: 7.4 acl: what is a*r*w*d*? Rod Taylor
11:44 Re: Are we losing momentum? Rod Taylor
13:23 EXECUTE INTO Peter Eisentraut
13:36 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane
13:50 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
14:29 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane
14:33 Re: Are we losing momentum? scott.marlowe
14:34 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
14:37 Re: Are we losing momentum? Dave Page
15:02 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane
15:38 Re: linking problem with gcc-mingw Hiroshi Saito
15:38 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
17:00 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Peter Eisentraut
17:01 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Barry Lind
17:01 Re: CLOSE command tag Peter Eisentraut
17:06 query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Robert Dyas
19:20 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Dennis Björklund
20:05 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Hannu Krosing
20:17 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Sander Steffann
22:09 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Tom Lane

24 April 2003

00:37 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner
01:59 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Tom Lane
04:49 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sailesh Krishnamurthy
06:34 Putting code in main of src/backend/main/main.c S -
06:46 forking child processes in src/backend/main/main.c S -
07:05 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c ----> LockAcquire() S -
07:20 Re: forking child processes in src/backend/main/main.c Sailesh Krishnamurthy
09:17 Postgresql Filesystem Kevin Lo
10:27 Re: Postgresql Filesystem Christopher Browne
11:46 Unrelated question Ben Clewett
12:02 Re: Putting code in main of src/backend/main/main.c Tom Lane
12:03 Re: forking child processes in src/backend/main/main.c Tom Lane
12:06 Re: Are we losing momentum? Rod Taylor
12:10 Re: src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c ----> LockAcquire() Tom Lane
12:33 putting new pdf docs on ftp site Robert Treat
12:39 Re: Unrelated question Jeroen T. Vermeulen
12:40 Re: Unrelated question Hannu Krosing
13:13 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Robert Dyas
13:22 Re: putting new pdf docs on ftp site Dave Page
13:29 pg_dump dumping... core ohp@pyrenet.fr
13:57 Re: pg_dump dumping... core Tom Lane
13:58 libpq.dll (Win32) for rel. 7.3.2 missing some exports Karl Waclawek
14:11 Re: libpq.dll (Win32) for rel. 7.3.2 missing some exports Bruce Momjian
14:16 Re: libpq.dll (Win32) for rel. 7.3.2 missing some exports Tom Lane
14:26 Re: libpq.dll (Win32) for rel. 7.3.2 missing some exports Karl Waclawek
15:45 Re: pg_dump dumping... core ohp@pyrenet.fr
16:29 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Barry Lind
16:31 Re: pg_dump dumping... core ohp@pyrenet.fr
17:00 Re: pg_dump dumping... core ohp@pyrenet.fr
17:07 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Kurt Roeckx
17:19 table creation using backend functions Alice Lottini
17:35 close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
17:36 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Robert Dyas
18:17 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Stephan Szabo
20:09 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Robert Dyas
20:24 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! scott.marlowe
20:45 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Stephan Szabo
20:52 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Stephan Szabo
20:56 Re: table creation using backend functions Tom Lane
21:13 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sailesh Krishnamurthy
21:28 Re: Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
21:46 Re: Are we losing momentum? Sailesh Krishnamurthy
22:14 Re: Are we losing momentum? Rod Taylor
23:30 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Tom Lane

25 April 2003

01:01 Re: Postgresql Filesystem Kevin Lo
02:06 compile error on cvs tip Joe Conway
02:12 Re: compile error on cvs tip Tom Lane
02:22 Re: compile error on cvs tip Joe Conway
02:32 Re: compile error on cvs tip Tom Lane
03:17 Re: Putting code in main of src/backend/main/main.c Sumaira Ali -
03:28 Re: Putting code in main of src/backend/main/main.c Tom Lane
03:33 Re: compile error on cvs tip Joe Conway
03:40 Re: compile error on cvs tip Tom Lane
03:45 Re: compile error on cvs tip Joe Conway
05:35 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Shridhar Daithankar
05:47 Re: compile error on cvs tip Sean Chittenden
06:28 Re: putting new pdf docs on ftp site Dave Page
07:34 Re: linking problem with gcc-mingw Shi-Sen Chang
08:51 STABLE functions Joachim Wieland
10:07 Statement triggers 7.4 NEW/OLD Andreas Pflug
11:04 Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Using Olleg Samojlov
11:30 Re: close() vs. closesocket() mlw
13:03 Re: STABLE functions Tom Lane
13:10 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Tom Lane
13:13 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
13:14 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
13:59 Re: STABLE functions Joachim Wieland
14:14 Re: STABLE functions Tom Lane
14:17 Re: close() vs. closesocket() pgsql@mohawksoft.com
14:35 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
15:00 Re: close() vs. closesocket() pgsql@mohawksoft.com
15:03 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
15:09 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
15:10 Re: close() vs. closesocket() pgsql@mohawksoft.com
15:16 Re: close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian
15:43 Re: close() vs. closesocket() pgsql@mohawksoft.com
18:53 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Jan Wieck
19:19 pg_constraint and constraint triggers Dave Page
19:51 Re: pg_constraint and constraint triggers Tom Lane
20:39 pg_namespace -> pg_schema? Sean Chittenden
21:20 Re: pg_namespace -> pg_schema? Tom Lane
21:35 How about an am_superuser GUC parameter (non-settable)? Tom Lane
21:46 conflicting libraries at runtime Joe Conway

26 April 2003

00:37 Re: Putting code in main of src/backend/main/main.c Sumaira Ali -
07:53 Re: pg_constraint and constraint triggers Dave Page
14:22 Less global variables Alvaro Herrera
15:45 Re: conflicting libraries at runtime Tom Lane
19:48 [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Sean Chittenden
20:05 Array access to type "name" Peter Eisentraut
20:19 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Tom Lane
20:36 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Sean Chittenden
21:16 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Sean Chittenden
21:24 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Tom Lane
21:25 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Tom Lane
21:34 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Sean Chittenden
22:57 Re: conflicting libraries at runtime Peter Eisentraut

27 April 2003

00:07 Re: conflicting libraries at runtime Joe Conway
00:10 Re: conflicting libraries at runtime Joe Conway
00:53 Re: STABLE functions Philip Warner
01:48 current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tatsuo Ishii
03:37 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Sean Chittenden
03:56 Re: STABLE functions Tom Lane
04:06 Re: Array access to type "name" Tom Lane
04:14 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
04:28 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
06:58 Re: STABLE functions Joachim Wieland
07:35 Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas... Sean Chittenden
09:07 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tatsuo Ishii
14:14 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
15:26 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
16:24 Re: Array access to type "name" Peter Eisentraut
16:35 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
17:16 Re: Array access to type "name" Tom Lane
18:06 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
19:11 Re: Array access to type "name" Tom Lane
19:43 PROCLOCK Sumaira Ali -
21:20 ProcLock--> holding[] Sumaira Ali -
22:18 Prepared queries and ANALYZE Gavin Sherry

28 April 2003

03:57 Re: Prepared queries and ANALYZE Tom Lane
04:01 Re: Prepared queries and ANALYZE Sailesh Krishnamurthy
04:25 LockData (Lock.h) Sumaira Ali -
04:37 Re: Prepared queries and ANALYZE Gavin Sherry
06:51 Re: STABLE functions Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
08:37 INSERT/UPDATE ... RETURNING Gavin Sherry
10:01 Re: [PERFORM] Diferent execution plan for similar query Shridhar Daithankar
10:19 Re: INSERT/UPDATE ... RETURNING Jan Wieck
13:04 Re: INSERT/UPDATE ... RETURNING Philip Warner
13:18 Re: INSERT/UPDATE ... RETURNING Tom Lane
14:48 Please, apply patch for current CVS Teodor Sigaev

29 April 2003

00:04 LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? prashanth@jibenetworks.com
00:16 Re: How about an am_superuser GUC parameter (non-settable)? Peter Eisentraut
00:41 Re: How about an am_superuser GUC parameter (non-settable)? Bruce Momjian
01:06 Re: How about an am_superuser GUC parameter (non-settable)? Tom Lane
01:19 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Tom Lane
02:07 Re: How about an am_superuser GUC parameter (non-settable)? Bruce Momjian
03:48 Re: Changing the default configuration Matthew T. O'Connor
05:19 Searching for symbols with tsearch Christopher Kings-Lynne
06:11 Re: Searching for symbols with tsearch Hannu Krosing
06:11 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Hannu Krosing
07:20 FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers Andreas Pflug
08:14 Problem with COPY on RedHat 8 with PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Hans-Juergen Schoenig
08:40 Han
12:18 Re: Robert Treat
14:16 Re: Searching for symbols with tsearch scott.marlowe
14:33 Re: Problem with COPY on RedHat 8 with PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Tom Lane
14:42 Re: Searching for symbols with tsearch Teodor Sigaev
15:11 Re: Sailesh Krishnamurthy
15:46 Re: Problem with COPY on RedHat 8 with PostgreSQL 7.3.2 Tom Lane
16:57 Transform groups Peter Eisentraut
17:16 Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Jason Tishler
17:27 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Bruce Momjian
18:31 Re: FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers Jan Wieck
18:36 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? prashanth@jibenetworks.com
18:37 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Tom Lane
18:37 Re: Transform groups Tom Lane
18:44 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? prashanth@jibenetworks.com
18:50 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Tom Lane
19:23 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Jason Tishler
19:28 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Jason Tishler
19:43 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Kurt Roeckx
20:05 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Bruce Momjian
20:37 "Adding missing from clause" Josh Berkus
21:21 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Tom Lane
21:38 Re: "Adding missing from clause" Tom Lane
23:17 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? prashanth@jibenetworks.com
23:30 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Sean Chittenden

30 April 2003

00:10 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Gavin Sherry
00:26 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? Sean Chittenden
00:38 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tatsuo Ishii
01:23 Re: "Adding missing from clause" Philip Warner
02:47 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
09:35 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
10:57 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tatsuo Ishii
11:32 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Jason Tishler
13:00 Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING Tom Lane
13:26 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Tom Lane
13:49 Trx issues: SELECT FOR UPDATE LIMIT James Mancz
14:07 Re: Trx issues: SELECT FOR UPDATE LIMIT Tom Lane
14:18 pattern match, index use and performance John Liu
14:49 Re: Trx issues: SELECT FOR UPDATE LIMIT Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
16:34 PITR: Proposed modifications to JR's design Patrick Macdonald
18:14 Planned changes in backend memory management Tom Lane
20:21 Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? Daniele Orlandi
20:48 Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? Stephan Szabo
21:02 Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? Daniele Orlandi
21:16 Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? Stephan Szabo
23:32 Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? Tom Lane
23:32 Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? Andrew Dunstan
23:40 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS build issues Francisco Figueiredo Jr.