Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Date
Msg-id 8765pjht2d.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> So?  You're going to be paying those costs *anyway*, because most of the
> process context swaps will be between the application server and the
> database.  

Separating the database and application onto dedicated machines is normally
the first major optimization busy sites do when they discover that having the
two on the same machine never scales well.

--
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: CVSup binary RPMs for Red Hat 9 available