Re: Are we losing momentum? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Subject Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date
Msg-id bxyadeg1m3j.fsf@datafix.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Are we losing momentum?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: Are we losing momentum?  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "scott" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes:
   scott> Plus the fact that the underlying pg_ tables are stable   scott> from release to release makes it a bit
awkwardto upgrade   scott> the servers they play on.  Most of them have gone ahead and   scott> created views that give
thema consistent view of the parts   scott> of the database they need.
 

This is exactly the reason why in db2 _no_ guarantees are made
regarding the constancy of the system catalogs (that are in the SYSIBM
schema). Instead, the equivalent views (in the SYSCAT schema) are
_never_ broken (whether in a point release or a new version). In fact,
the SYSCAT views correspond to the ISO SQL standard. 

-- 
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!!
Next
From: "S -"
Date:
Subject: Putting code in main of src/backend/main/main.c