Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration
Date
Msg-id 1051591298.7047.11.camel@zeutrh9
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:10, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Sigh. People always complain "pgbench does not reliably producing
> repeatable numbers" or something then say "that's because pgbench's
> transaction has too much contention on the branches table". So I added
> -N option to pgbench which makes pgbench not to do any UPDATE to
> the branches table. But still people continue to complian...

What exactly does the -N option do?  I see no mention of it in the
README.pgbench, which might be part of reason people "continue to
complain".


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: ObjectWeb