Tom Lane wrote:
> So it now seems clear to me that we are in error to reject CREATE GLOBAL
> TEMP TABLE; we ought to accept that.
>
> What I am wondering now is if we should flip the logic to reject CREATE
> LOCAL TEMP TABLE? Or should we just silently accept both? I'm leaning
> towards the latter, on the grounds of backward compatibility.
Well, since we don't support modules, I think we should allow LOCAL. If
we had modules, we should reject it.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
