On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:54:13AM -0500, cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com wrote:
> > I have been planning to "test" the whole thing with a few .NET
> > applications. I am currently using expat to parse the output to ensure
> > that it all works correcty.
>
> That, unfortunately, probably implies that your implementation is almost
> totally non-interoperable.
>
> You should put out of your mind the notion of being "correct." Being
> "correct" is pretty irrelevant if 80% of the requests that come from a VB.NET
> client fail because Microsoft implemented part of their request differently
> than what you interpreted as "correct."
>
> The point is that "correctness" isn't the thing you need to aim for; what you
> should aim for is interoperability with the important client implementations.
>
> SOAP::Lite, .NET, probably some Java ones, C++ ones, and such.
>
> Nobody does "correctness" testing; they do interoperability tests where they
> try to submit requests to Apache AXIS, .NET, WebSphere, and the lot of other
> important implementations. If you're testing a server (as is the case here),
> then the point is to run tests with a bunch of clients.
>
> Head to the SOAP::Lite and Axis projects; you'll see matrices describing this
> sort of thing...
Hmmm. Can I reiterate my support of XML-RPC here? <g>
-Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice
> --
> (reverse (concatenate 'string "ac.notelrac.teneerf@" "454aa"))
> http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/advocacy.html
> "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to using Windows
> NT for mission-critical applications." --- What Yoda *meant* to say
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
