Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
Subject Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?
Date
Msg-id 20030403125413.CB5E158C03@cbbrowne.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?  (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?  ("Jason M. Felice" <jfelice@cronosys.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I have been planning to "test" the whole thing with a few .NET 
> applications. I am currently using expat to parse the output to ensure 
> that it all works correcty.

That, unfortunately, probably implies that your implementation is almost 
totally non-interoperable.

You should put out of your mind the notion of being "correct."  Being 
"correct" is pretty irrelevant if 80% of the requests that come from a VB.NET 
client fail because Microsoft implemented part of their request differently 
than what you interpreted as "correct."

The point is that "correctness" isn't the thing you need to aim for; what you 
should aim for is interoperability with the important client implementations.

SOAP::Lite, .NET, probably some Java ones, C++ ones, and such.

Nobody does "correctness" testing; they do interoperability tests where they 
try to submit requests to Apache AXIS, .NET, WebSphere, and the lot of other 
important implementations.  If you're testing a server (as is the case here), 
then the point is to run tests with a bunch of clients.

Head to the SOAP::Lite and Axis projects; you'll see matrices describing this 
sort of thing...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "ac.notelrac.teneerf@" "454aa"))
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/advocacy.html
"Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to using Windows
NT for mission-critical applications."  --- What Yoda *meant* to say



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib and licensing