Re: Question about simple function folding optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: Question about simple function folding optimization
Date
Msg-id 20030409170734.GA497@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question about simple function folding optimization  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Question about simple function folding optimization  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:54:23 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> The simplest answer is probably to convert the function to plpgsql,
> which would probably give better performance for index access anyway.
> But I wonder whether any better answer is possible.  I don't want to
> give up on the inlining optimization --- anyone see another fix?

Include an option for function definitions to not allow the function
being defined to be inlined.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?