I wrote:
> J M Sykes wrote:
>
>>I have been looking at
>>
>>ftp://ftp.be.postgresql.org/postgresql/doc/7.2/reference-7.2-A4.pdf
>>
>>and on page 70, CREATE TABLE, Compatibility, I find a statement that
>>suggests the writer was under a misapprehension.
>>
>>You say first:
>>
>><quote>
>>The CREATE TABLE conforms to SQL92 Intermediate and to a subset of SQL99,
>>with exceptions listed below and in the descriptions above.
>
> ...
>
>>However, none of these conform to SQL:1992 at any level (or to
>>the temporary tables feature of SQL:1999), so you're in good
>>company, but apparently mistaken.
>
>
> Yeah. This was the subject of my confusion as well. Tom sorts it
> out:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=3E28A02C.5090900%40mascari.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMike%2BMascari%2Btemp%2Bglobal%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26hl%3Den
>
>
>>FYI, though not a member of the ANSI committee, I do contribute to the ISO
>>working group.
>>
>>Mike Sykes.
I should also have written:
1. Obviously the PostgreSQL docs need to be updated as they are
still incorrect in the development version
2. Since you contribute to the ISO working group may I make a
suggestion? The standard for temporary tables includes the
options ON COMMIT { PRESERVE ROWS | DELETE ROWS }. 7.4 of
PostgreSQL, thanks to Gavin Sherry, will include DROP as one of
the ON COMMIT options. Any chance at that getting standardized?
Mike Mascari
mascarm@mascari.com
