On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> > > The hack was just the keeping around the list pointer from the last run
> > > through (see attached - passed simple fk tests and regression, but there
> > > might be problems I don't see).
> >
> > Shouldn't this patch update the comment in deferredTriggerInvokeEvents
> > (c. line 1860 in cvs tip)?
>
> Probably, since the second part of that is basically what this is. I'll
> update and send updated patch tomorrow.
Okay, this changes the second paragraph of that comment. I left in the
comment that's really similar next to where I actually do the selection of
which start point to use.
