Great. I think it can be made acceptable with little work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Instead of tables and their indexes being on the same platter, you'd
> > > be able to put them on separate platters. Sounds like it would likely
> > > yield a performance gain to me...
> >
> > That has *nothing* to do with whether we name files after tables or not.
> > As Andrew pointed out, you don't really want people munging file
> > locations by hand anyway; until we have a proper tablespace
> > implementation, it's going to be tedious and error-prone no matter what.
>
> Just so people are aware, I'm getting Jim Buttfuoco's tablespaces patch
> from him again, and getting it up to CVS. I'll then see what needs to be
> done to it such that it would be accepted...
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
