Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Date
Msg-id 4096.1049860699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?  ("Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace@earthlink.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace@earthlink.net> writes:
> Unfortunately, the performance of PostgreSQL MVCC in comparison to say
> Oracle (the performance leader amongst MVCC DB's, and pretty much for
> all DB's for that matter) is not competitive.

Ron, the tests that I've seen offer no support for that thesis.  If you
want us to accept such a blanket statement as fact, you'd better back
it up with evidence.  Let's see some test cases.

Postgres certainly has plenty of performance issues, but I have no
reason to believe that the fundamental MVCC mechanism is one of them.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shinji Teragaito
Date:
Subject: Re: HP-UX 11.22 (IA64) IPF Patch for PostgreSQL 7.3.2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_viewdef 7.4 et al