>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> But really this is a special case of the problem of "schema Tom> changed underneath a plan", and yes it'd be
niceto notice Tom> that and invalidate the plan.
In general, pgsql doesn't cache access plans, correct ?
If there was a cache of access plans, repeated queries (not just
prepared by the same client) could use the same plan avoiding
recompilation. The cache will also be a single place in shared memory
where invalidation can take place.
Just my 2c.
--
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
