Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0304031941210.2215-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Andrew Sullivan expressed concern about this, too.  The thing could
> be made a little more failsafe if we made it impossible to set
> ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES to true in postgresql.conf, or by any means other
> than an actual SET command --- whose impact would then be limited to
> the current session.  This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism,
> but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to
> refuse non-interactive settings).

Fighting against people who randomly change settings without being
informed about what they do is pointless.  It's like trying to prevent
'rm -rf /*'.  And it's not like you can easily set anything in
postgresql.conf by accident.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: gmake does not finish on default slackware 9 (or 8.1) install
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: gmake does not finish on default slackware 9 (or 8.1)