Re: CLOSE command tag - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: CLOSE command tag
Date
Msg-id 1051061423.370.431.camel@tokyo
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLOSE command tag  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: CLOSE command tag  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 09:11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The command tags are aligned with the SQL standard (see under <get
> diagnostics statement>), which doesn't appear to make much sense in this
> case, but it doesn't hurt anyone.

Fair enough.

If we're going to SQL-compliant here, there are a couple other command
tags that should be corrected: COMMIT -> COMMIT WORK, ROLLBACK ->
ROLLBACK WORK, UPDATE -> UPDATE WHERE, DELETE -> DELETE WHERE, etc.

Cheers,

Neil



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?