Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 01db01c30333$c0ad1590$3201a8c0@beeblebrox Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Seems like a small reasonable patch to me, and several folks want it. > I am bit worried with this regression issue. I posted this about a week ago but didn't get any response. Anyone else tested this? I re-run the test on a fresh download of 7.3.2. Same. Jan, you mentioned something concerning an error messages - is this issue causing the regression error? This is the message I posted before: I applied the patch to a 7.3.2 installation, and did a make clean, make, make check. There is one regression error. Is this an expected behaviour? Or did I do something wrong? See regression diffs: *** ./expected/foreign_key.out Sun Sep 22 02:37:09 2002 --- ./results/foreign_key.out Sat Apr 12 20:44:54 2003 *************** *** 882,888 **** ERROR: $1 referential integrity violation - key in pktable still referenced from pktable -- fails (1,1) is being referenced (twice) update pktable set base1=3 where base1=1; ! ERROR: $1 referential integrity violation - key referenced from pktable not found in pktable -- this sequence of two deletes will work, since after the first there will be no (2,*) references delete from pktable where base2=2; delete from pktable where base1=2; --- 882,888 ---- ERROR: $1 referential integrity violation - key in pktable still referenced from pktable -- fails (1,1) is being referenced (twice) update pktable set base1=3 where base1=1; ! ERROR: $1 referential integrity violation - key in pktable still referenced from pktable -- this sequence of two deletes will work, since after the first there will be no (2,*) references delete from pktable where base2=2; delete from pktable where base1=2; Regards, Michael Paesold > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > > Jan Wieck wrote: > > Stephan Szabo wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > > > > > > > The changes I committed to address most of the FK deadlock problems > > > > > > reported can easily be applied to the 7.3 and 7.2 source trees as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Except for a slight change in the text of the error message that gets > > > > > > thrown "if one tries to delete a referenced PK for which a FK with ON > > > > > > DELETE SET DEFAULT exists" (it's a rare case, believe me), this patch > > > > > > would qualify for backpatching. The unnecessary FOR UPDATE lock of > > > > > > referenced rows could be counted as a bug. > > > > > > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > > > > > Since I seem to suffer from these horrible deadlock problems all the > > > > > time, I'd like it to be backported to 7.3... > > > > > > > > Me too! > > > > > > As a note, this'll solve some of the deadlocks on fk update (generally the > > > key values aren't touched) but not insert related ones (two rows inserted > > > to the same primary key causing one to wait and possible deadlocks) > > > > > > In any case, why don't we get a patch against 7.3, and make an > > > announcement and let people who are interested use it and test it. With > > > in-field testing it'd probably be safe enough. :) > > > > Here it is. > > > > > > Jan > > > > -- > > #======================================================================# > > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # > > # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # > > #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
pgsql-hackers by date: