Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
Date
Msg-id 10473.1050445380@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Seems so.  I was saying we would remove LOCAL _only_ if we had modules
> and didn't support LOCAL for them.

Okay.  For now, I think backwards compatibility is a sufficiently good
reason to accept LOCAL as a noise word, anyway.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?