Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Subject Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")
Date
Msg-id 200304221232.14447.darcy@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tuesday 22 April 2003 11:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> My recommendation at the moment would be: WAL on dedicated spindle,
> everything else on the best RAID array you can set up.  And buy as much
> RAM as you can afford.

Hmm.  Is this safe?  Let's assume for argument's sake that the RAID is 100% 
reliable and that the local spindle will eventually fail.  Can I lose data by 
leaving WAL on the local spindle?  Or are you suggesting two full RAID 
systems?

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")