> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Great. I think it can be made acceptable with little work.
>
> IIRC, the reason Jim's patch got bounced was exactly that it offered an
> implementation of only one policy, with no possibility of extension.
I read all the comments regarding Jim's patch, but would you mind stating
exactly what your concern is, Tom? What do you mean by 'one policy'?
Chris
