Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date
Msg-id 200304152036.h3FKaqx06256@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com> writes:
> > This all sounds great.  I am really looking to seeing all of this 
> > implemented.  Are you still on schedule for getting this into 7.4?
> 
> I gotta get off my duff and get with it, but I still plan to do it.

I am wondering if the wondering if the start of 7.5 may not be a better
time for such a massive change, and to give interfaces time to catch up.

Also, is Patrick going to need your help for PITR in 7.4?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: qualified column names
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol