Ron Peacetree wrote:
> ...and if so, what are the current efforts focusing on?
What is it that you think of as being potentially "better" about some
would-be-alternative "transaction locking" scheme?
PostgreSQL already supports MVCC, which is commonly considered to be the
"better" scheme that eliminates a lot of need to lock data.
Furthermore, the phrase "transaction locking" doesn't seem to describe
what one would want to lock. I wouldn't want to lock a "transaction;"
I'd want to lock DATA.
--
(concatenate 'string "cbbrowne" "@cbbrowne.com")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #153. "My Legions of Terror will be an
equal-opportunity employer. Conversely, when it is prophesied that no
man can defeat me, I will keep in mind the increasing number of
non-traditional gender roles." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
