Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20030423014918.03f096b8@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 11:31 AM 22/04/2003 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>If anything I'd expect to see
>padding added on the right.

Yep. Put it down to a typo/late night. Padding to right is the norm with 
varbit.


> > Doesn't seem too unreasonable to support varbit<->numeric conversions.

At least in 7.3.2 we can't cast int to varbit. Worse still (and maybe I am 
missing something):

# select cast(8 as bit(10));    bit
------------ 0000000000





----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?