Re: optimizer cost calculation problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: optimizer cost calculation problem
Date
Msg-id 20030402190225.GJ16181@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: optimizer cost calculation problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:24:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > This isn't really an issue for 64 bit hardware is it?
> 
> Is "int" 64 bits on such a machine?  The ones I've dealt with chose to

It was for the regression tests we did recently on a 64-bit
gcc-3.2-compiled Solaris 8 binary.  Piles of regression failures
because int was not 32 bits.

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8                                        +1 416 646 3304
x110



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect).
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4devel auth failed