Re: Redhat DB differences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Redhat DB differences
Date
Msg-id 29288.1050515710@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Redhat DB differences  (Rob Butler <robert.butler5@verizon.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Rob Butler <robert.butler5@verizon.net> writes:
> What are the differences between RHDB and Postgres?

RHDB *is* Postgres, plus some separate tools which you can find at 
http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/, plus (in original concept) additional
support effort such as back-porting bug fixes to stable releases that
the community isn't interested in maintaining anymore.  That last part
has been dropped (for the moment) since RHDB isn't being offered as a
product (for the moment).

> Will Redhat be contributing any of those added features / capabilities
> / etc., back to the Postgres project if RHDB continues to be shipped?

The RHDB tools are still available and still being developed.  Since
they are GPL (per Red Hat company policy) there isn't really any
prospect of integrating them into the BSD-license core PG distribution.
But there would not be anything to stop someone from picking them up
as a non-core project (on gborg say) if Red Hat stopped funding
work on them.  Also, even today the Red Hat database group would be
pleased to see some outside contributions of work on those tools ...
        regards, tom lane        Red Hat Database project



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?")
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables