Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance
Date
Msg-id 20030418080950.R2132-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> > Argh. I'm getting that state where gprof returns all 0s for times.  I'm
> > pretty sure this has come up before along with how to get it to work, but
> > I couldn't find it in the archives. Someday I'll learn how to use gprof. :(
>
> You're on Linux?  You need to compile postmaster.c with -DLINUX_PROFILE.

Yep, thanks. :)

> But the call counts do sound pretty damning.

Yeah, but even with my hack last night it was still appreciably slower
than immediate constraints. Comparing the call counts in that function
for the immediate versus deferred(hacked) weren't giving me a good idea of
where that time was going.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL]
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2