"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
> Somehow I did not see that conclusion made.
> I thought, at least for JDBC, it is already successfully used ?
Barry, at least, seemed to be happy with removing it, given the planned
protocol change to report current transaction state after every query.
> I think the backend autocommit is useful. Maybe only the
> installation/database/user wide GUC setting should be depricated/
> disabled, so it is only used by a session SET ?
That wouldn't really solve any of the problems.
regards, tom lane
