Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 April 2001

• 02:07   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane
• 02:16   Re: Re: [SQL] possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 Forest Wilkinson
• 02:34   Re: Third call for platform testing (linux 2.4.x) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 02:55   Re: [ADMIN] User administration tool Jan T. Kim
• 03:04   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane
• 03:11   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Philip Warner
• 03:13   MacOS X OK, was: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
• 03:15   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Christopher Masto
• 03:20   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Philip Warner
• 03:25   Complete Database Permission Johnny Cristensen
• 03:43   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Philip Warner
• 03:44   [pgsql-hackers-owner+M6959@postgresql.org: Majordomo Delivery Error] Roberto Mello
• 07:21   Re: Call for platforms Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 07:49   PL/SQL and null Kaare Rasmussen
• 18:11   Re: [pgsql-hackers-owner+M6959@postgresql.org: Majordomo Delivery Error] Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: PL/SQL and null Roberto Mello

2 April 2001

• 02:10   Re: Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
• 05:50   Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
• 06:58   Bug in user-defined types? Adriaan Joubert
• 10:25   CVS commits Michael Meskes
• 10:32   Re: plpython for postgres 7.1 Karel Zak
• 10:43   Re: CVS commits Alfred Perlstein
• 10:51   QNX : POSSIBLE BUG IN CONFIGURE ? Maurizio
• 11:39   Re: CVS commits The Hermit Hacker
• 13:24   Re: Bug in user-defined types? Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: [SQL] Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP Bruce Momjian
• 14:05   Re: Re: [SQL] Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP Peter Eisentraut
• 14:07   Re: Re: [SQL] Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Irix binaries of 7.1 RC1 are available bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 15:23   Shouldn't ON UPDATE/DELETE triggers be BEFORE triggers? Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Peter Eisentraut
• 15:36   Re: QNX : POSSIBLE BUG IN CONFIGURE ? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:04   Re: Indexes vs indices Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: Indexes vs indices Bruce Momjian
• 16:16   RE: Shouldn't ON UPDATE/DELETE triggers be BEFORE trigg ers? Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:27   Re: Re: Indexes vs indices Lamar Owen
• 16:38   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane
• 16:59   Update HISTORY/release.sgml Bruce Momjian
• 20:15   Re: Shouldn't ON UPDATE/DELETE triggers be BEFORE triggers? Stephan Szabo
• 20:22   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:37   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:51   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:26   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane

3 April 2001

• 01:11   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Philip Warner
• 02:57   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane
• 03:43   Do we have any platforms that allow null pointer dereference? Tom Lane
• 04:30   Re: Bug in user-defined types? Adriaan Joubert
• 05:02   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Philip Warner
• 07:58   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Philip Warner
• 09:07   Re: capitalized sql (was: Re: Changing the default valu e of an inherited column) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:01   Re: Third call for platform testing Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:08   Re: capitalized sql (was: Re: Changing the default valu e of an inherited column) darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 11:11   Re: capitalized sql (was: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column) Philip Warner
• 13:12   Re: Re: Changing the default value of an inherited column Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: Bug in user-defined types? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:46   Re: Re: Bug in user-defined types? Tom Lane
• 14:31   Final call for platform testing Thomas Lockhart
• 14:40   ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Adriaan Joubert
• 14:56   Re: Final call for platform testing Dominic J. Eidson
• 15:12   Re: Final call for platform testing bpalmer
• 15:20   RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:31   International characters and the jdbcdriver Fredrik Hultkrantz
• 15:34   Re: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Tom Lane
• 15:38   Re: QNX : POSSIBLE BUG IN CONFIGURE ? Maurizio
• 15:52   Re: Final call for platform testing Thomas Lockhart
• 16:00   RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:04   Re: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: Final call for platform testing Tom Lane
• 17:34   pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys Tom Lane
• 18:46   Re: pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys Philip Warner
• 19:18   Re: pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:10   Re: Final call for platform testing ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:18   Missing include files. Chris Bowlby
• 20:54   Re: [GENERAL] Missing include files. Larry Rosenman
• 21:38   Re: plpython for postgres 7.1 Joel Burton
• 22:37   RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:17   Re: Final call for platform testing Thomas Lockhart
• 23:54   Re: Re: Final call for platform testing ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)

4 April 2001

• 02:58   Is this a bug in 7.0.2 Steven Vajdic
• 04:15   Re: Final call for platform testing Adriaan Joubert
• 06:58   Re: Final call for platform testing Cyril VELTER
• 08:37   optreset test failed in configure on Solaris 7.1RC2 elwood@agouros.de (Konstantinos Agouros)
• 09:33   Re: Final call for platform testing Pete Forman
• 09:49   Re: Re: Final call for platform testing Vince Vielhaber
• 11:02   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Michael Meskes
• 11:06   All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
• 11:23   Re: optreset test failed in configure on Solaris 7.1RC2 Frank Byrum
• 11:40   logging is funny... Fouad Fezzi
• 12:33   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Michael Meskes
• 12:59   Re: logging is funny... Bruce Momjian
• 12:59   Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Tom Lane
• 13:04   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: Final call for platform testing Thomas Lockhart
• 13:53   Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:57   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Adriaan Joubert
• 14:07   Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Tom Lane
• 14:18   Special char problem, need help. Boulat Khakimov
• 14:52   RE: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:08   RE: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:09   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Thomas Lockhart
• 17:02   Problem Building on Mac OSX Neil Tiffin
• 18:15   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Michael Meskes
• 18:45   Configure problems on Solaris 2.7, pgsql 7.02 and 7.03 Ciaran Johnston
• 19:59   Re: TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 20:40   Re: Re: TODO list Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: Re: TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 20:45   Re: Re: Final call for platform testing Martín Marqués
• 20:49   Re: Configure problems on Solaris 2.7, pgsql 7.02 and 7.03 Martín Marqués
• 21:38   Re: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Thomas Lockhart
• 21:56   Regression failed Mac OSX Neil Tiffin
• 22:05   RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:13   Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Tom Lane
• 22:33   Re: Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:38   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Tom Lane
• 22:46   Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Mathijs Brands
• 22:47   Re: Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Martín Marqués
• 22:54   Re: Configure problems on Solaris 2.7, pgsql 7.02 and 7.03 Mathijs Brands
• 23:15   Re: Regression failed Mac OSX Peter Bierman
• 23:16   Re: Configure problems on Solaris 2.7, pgsql 7.02 and 7.03 Tom Lane

5 April 2001

• 00:31   RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 04:41   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Adriaan Joubert
• 04:59   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Tom Lane
• 05:14   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Adriaan Joubert
• 07:11   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 07:42   AW: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:47   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Michael Meskes
• 08:35   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Michael Meskes
• 08:55   Re: RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash Vadim Mikheev
• 11:15   Re: Configure problems on Solaris 2.7, pgsql 7.02 and 7.03 Ciaran Johnston
• 11:19   On the road Michael Meskes
• 13:08   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Tom Lane
• 13:18   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Tom Lane
• 15:13   AW: Re: TODO list Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 16:23   Re: AW: Re: TODO list Tom Lane
• 16:31   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Tom Lane
• 19:40   Re: Re: TODO list Ken Hirsch
• 20:01   Re: Re: TODO list ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:28   RE: Re: TODO list Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:38   Re: Re: TODO list ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:47   RE: Re: TODO list Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:06   Re: Re: TODO list ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:25   Re: Re: TODO list Tom Lane
• 23:29   Re: Re: TODO list Bruce Momjian

6 April 2001

• 00:39   Re: Re: TODO list ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 01:07   Re: Re: TODO list Philip Warner
• 01:37   RE: Re: TODO list Mikheev, Vadim
• 01:52   Re: Re: TODO list Tom Lane
• 01:59   RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:26   Re: RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? Tom Lane
• 02:44   Re: RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:09   Re: Re: TODO list Philip Warner
• 04:02   Foreign Key & Rule confusion WAS: Lost Trigger(s)? Rod Taylor
• 04:20   Re: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
• 04:26   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Thomas Lockhart
• 04:50   Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
• 04:51   Re: Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
• 04:54   Re: Foreign Key & Rule confusion WAS: Lost Trigger(s)? Tom Lane
• 04:57   Re: RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? Thomas Lockhart
• 05:49   Re: Re: RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? Tom Lane
• 09:12   Integer to float function Steven Vajdic
• 11:48   Foreign Key & Rule confusion RE: Lost Trigger(s)? Rod Taylor
• 11:48   Re: Re: TODO list Rod Taylor
• 12:04   INSERT Issues Rod Taylor
• 12:12   Re: Foreign Key & Rule confusion WAS: Lost Trigger(s)? Rod Taylor
• 12:46   Re: Integer to float function Thomas Lockhart
• 13:09   Re: Foreign Key & Rule confusion WAS: Lost Trigger(s)? Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: Integer to float function Peter Eisentraut
• 13:54   Re: INSERT Issues Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Re: Integer to float function Tom Lane
• 14:31   RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 14:34   Re: INSERT Issues Rod Taylor
• 14:34   Re: Foreign Key & Rule confusion WAS: Lost Trigger(s)? Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: INSERT Issues Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:52   Re: Foreign Key & Rule confusion WAS: Lost Trigger(s)? Rod Taylor
• 14:53   More Problems Matthew
• 15:21   Re: RC3 ... Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: Re: RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: RC3 ... Lamar Owen
• 15:46   RE: Re: RC3 ... anyone have anything left outstanding? Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:58   Re: RC3 ... Vince Vielhaber
• 16:19   Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:25   RE: Re: TODO list Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:28   Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:57   Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:10   Re: RC3 ... Vince Vielhaber
• 17:42   Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:47   Duplicate databases... Dominic J. Eidson
• 17:48   Re: Re: TODO list Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: Duplicate databases... Dominic J. Eidson
• 17:57   Re: More Problems Tom Lane
• 18:11   Re: Re: Call for platforms Larry Rosenman
• 18:40   Re: RC3 ... Vince Vielhaber
• 19:55   Re: Duplicate databases... Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: Duplicate databases... Tom Lane
• 20:31   Re: Duplicate databases... Dominic J. Eidson
• 20:35   Re: Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
• 20:44   Re: RC3 ... Thomas Lockhart
• 20:56   Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 20:57   Re: Re: RC3 ... Lamar Owen
• 22:19   Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:51   Re: RC3 ... Vince Vielhaber
• 22:51   Re: Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 22:57   Re: Re: RC3 ... Oliver Elphick
• 23:02   Re: Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:20   Re: Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 23:32   Re: Re: RC3 ... Tom Lane
• 23:41   Re: Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:48   Re: RC3 ... Thomas Lockhart
• 23:51   Re: Re: RC3 ... Thomas Lockhart

7 April 2001

• 00:24   Re: Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 00:25   Re: Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 01:11   Re: Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:27   Re: Re: RC3 ... Mathijs Brands
• 01:42   Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms... Franck Martin
• 01:46   Re: Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 03:00   pgmonitor completed Bruce Momjian
• 03:46   Re: Call for platforms Giles Lean
• 04:26   Re: Call for platforms (HP-UX) Giles Lean
• 04:32   Re: Call for platforms (HP-UX) Tom Lane
• 04:54   Call for platforms (Solaris) Mathijs Brands
• 08:23   createlang patch Oliver Elphick
• 11:04   Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms... Lamar Owen
• 11:09   Re: Re: RC3 ... Lamar Owen
• 11:14   Re: Re: RC3 ... Lamar Owen
• 12:40   Re: Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:56   Re: Re: RC3 ... Lamar Owen
• 13:12   Re: Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:12   Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms... Lamar Owen
• 13:33   Fw: QNX : POSSIBLE BUG IN CONFIGURE ? Maurizio
• 13:48   Re: Re: RC3 ... Lamar Owen
• 14:24   Re: createlang patch Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:14   Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:15   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:19   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:23   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:27   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:32   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 17:00   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 17:09   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 17:10   Re: Re: Call for platforms Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 17:26   Re: Re: RC3 ... Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: RC3 ... Joel Burton
• 17:51   Re: Re: Call for platforms Peter Eisentraut
• 18:41   Re: Re: Call for platforms Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 19:09   Message of move Kovacs Baldvin
• 19:11   The makefile of pgaccess (CVS) Kovacs Baldvin
• 22:14   A more useful way to split the distribution Peter Eisentraut
• 22:41   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution The Hermit Hacker
• 22:58   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Lamar Owen
• 23:20   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution The Hermit Hacker
• 23:21   7.1RC3 passes as 64 bit application on HP-UX 11.00 Giles Lean
• 23:54   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Vince Vielhaber

8 April 2001

• 00:43   Re: [ADMIN] pgmonitor completed Bruce Momjian
• 01:39   Re: Re: RC3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:25   Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms... Karl DeBisschop
• 02:50   Re: [ADMIN] pgmonitor completed Jie Liang
• 03:06   RE: [BUGS] Loosing files after backend crash KS
• 03:21   Re: Table Structure missive@frontiernet.net (Lee Harr)
• 03:31   libtcl Jie Liang
• 03:33   Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix Adriaan Joubert
• 03:35   RPMS for RC3 Lamar Owen
• 03:45   pg_dupp/pg_dumpall problem! Lehel Gyuro
• 03:46   release dates and announcements ? Peter Galbavy
• 03:48   Re: libtcl Bruce Momjian
• 03:49   Re: Debian packages of 7.1RC3 Oliver Elphick
• 03:52   Re: Final call for platform testing Jeff Duffy
• 03:57   Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms... Lamar Owen
• 04:01   re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] matthew green
• 04:08   PL/pgSQL IDE project Jean-Michel POURE
• 04:08   re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] matthew green
• 04:11   Debian packages of 7.1RC3 Oliver Elphick
• 04:19   Re: Re: Integer to float function steven_vajdic@ivillage.com
• 04:19   Test results for postgresql-7.1RC2 on NetBSD/macppc 1.5 Bill Studenmund
• 04:20   re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] matthew green
• 04:23   re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] matthew green
• 04:29   RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Lamar Owen
• 05:08   Re: release dates and announcements ? The Hermit Hacker
• 05:17   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Christopher Sawtell
• 05:28   RC3-3 RPMS. Lamar Owen
• 05:31   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC The Hermit Hacker
• 09:38   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Oliver Elphick
• 09:43   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Peter Eisentraut
• 10:11   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Peter Eisentraut
• 10:20   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Peter Eisentraut
• 11:27   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC The Hermit Hacker
• 11:40   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Peter Eisentraut
• 13:15   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Oliver Elphick
• 15:48   Re: Re: RC3 ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:39   Re: Re: A more useful way to split the distribution The Hermit Hacker
• 16:41   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC The Hermit Hacker
• 17:06   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution The Hermit Hacker
• 17:20   Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 18:42   Postgress on Windows Nadim H Rabbani
• 19:08   PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 The Hermit Hacker
• 19:37   Re: libtcl Jie Liang
• 19:51   Postgress On Windows Nadim H Rabbani
• 21:19   Re: RPMS for RC3 Peter Eisentraut
• 23:41   Re: RPMS for RC3 Lamar Owen
• 23:55   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Lamar Owen

9 April 2001

• 00:21   Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:25   Yellow Dog Linux/PPC regression Nat Irons
• 02:35   "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Justin Clift
• 03:18   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Bruce Momjian
• 03:33   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Bruce Momjian
• 05:27   Re: A more useful way to split the distribution Thomas Lockhart
• 05:34   Re: pg_dupp/pg_dumpall problem! Thomas Lockhart
• 05:44   Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 Thomas Lockhart
• 09:09   AW: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:55   Split Distro Henshall, Stuart - WCP
• 09:56   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Alessio Bragadini
• 11:03   Re: Split Distro The Hermit Hacker
• 12:13   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 Gavin Sherry
• 12:22   M68K... Larry Rosenman
• 12:27   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 Bruce Momjian
• 12:58   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 Gavin Sherry
• 13:40   Re: M68K... Thomas Lockhart
• 14:37   Re: Re: M68K... Larry Rosenman
• 15:08   Re: Yellow Dog Linux/PPC regression Peter Eisentraut
• 15:22   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:34   Re: RPMS for RC3 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:43   Re: AW: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Peter Eisentraut
• 16:04   timeout on lock Henryk Szal
• 16:07   RE: [pgAdmin-hackers] PL/pgSQL IDE project Dave Page
• 16:15   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Rod Taylor
• 16:24   timeout on lock feature Henryk Szal
• 16:51   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Justin Clift
• 17:21   Re: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 17:26   MySQL vs. Postgres - congratulations to the postgres team Mario Weilguni
• 17:27   Re: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 17:37   Re: Configure problems on Solaris 2.7, pgsql 7.02 and 7.03 Ciaran Johnston
• 17:43   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Bruce Momjian
• 18:10   Truncation of char, varchar types Peter Eisentraut
• 19:30   Re: Truncation of char, varchar types ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:53   Re: Truncation of char, varchar types The Hermit Hacker
• 19:58   libpq PQexec call of COPY John Coers
• 22:39   Re: Re: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
• 22:41   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) August Zajonc
• 23:15   Re: [GENERAL] JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Homayoun Yousefi'zadeh
• 23:55   Re: release dates and announcements ? Gordon Runkle

10 April 2001

• 01:02   Re: [GENERAL] JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Homayoun Yousefi'zadeh
• 01:25   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) August Zajonc
• 01:37   Re: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Doug McNaught
• 02:05   Re: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Norman J. Clarke
• 02:07   Re: JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Homayoun Yousefi'zadeh
• 05:14   Re: JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Doug McNaught
• 08:05   problem with copy command Jaruwan Laongmal
• 09:09   Re: Re: Call for platforms Giles Lean
• 09:11   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) John Gray
• 09:41   Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Alvar Freude
• 10:15   AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:25   Re: Truncation of char, varchar types Alessio Bragadini
• 12:26   Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Peter Mount
• 12:53   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:37   Re: Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Bruce Momjian
• 13:44   Re: Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Mitch Vincent
• 14:16   RE: Re: Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Darren King
• 14:23   Re: Re: Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Mitch Vincent
• 14:52   Re: problem with copy command Joel Burton
• 14:52   Re: Re: Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Bruce Momjian
• 15:14   Re: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Peter Eisentraut
• 15:19   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Stephan Szabo
• 15:25   Re: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Alessio Bragadini
• 15:39   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Alvar Freude
• 15:57   RE: Truncation of char, varchar types Mike Mascari
• 15:58   Re: libpq PQexec call of COPY Peter Eisentraut
• 15:59   Re: Truncation of char, varchar types Peter Eisentraut
• 16:24   Going from 7.0.3 -> 7.1 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:30   Re: JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Homayoun Yousefi'zadeh
• 16:38   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Mark Butler
• 16:38   Re: JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 Thomas Lockhart
• 17:22   HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? The Hermit Hacker
• 17:34   Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Joel Burton
• 17:43   Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? The Hermit Hacker
• 17:59   Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:26   Re: Going from 7.0.3 -> 7.1 ... Marko Kreen
• 19:41   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 20:01   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Andrew McMillan
• 20:09   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Bruce Momjian
• 21:59   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:18   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:30   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Kyle VanderBeek
• 23:35   Maybe a plpgsql bug? Lehel Gyuro
• 23:36   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Kyle VanderBeek

11 April 2001

• 01:34   Re: Speaking of Indexing... (Text indexing) Thomas Lockhart
• 01:41   Speaking of Indexing... (Text indexing) Poet/Joshua Drake
• 01:57   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Thomas Lockhart
• 02:12   Re: Extensible mechanism for type promotion / demotion Mark Butler
• 02:18   Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) Andrew McMillan
• 04:36   Re: Speaking of Indexing... (Text indexing) Andrew McMillan
• 08:02   AW: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:34   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 10:41   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Philip Warner
• 10:58   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Philip Warner
• 13:07   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Thomas Swan
• 13:59   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:07   Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:08   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:25   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Philip Warner
• 14:33   age() function documentation Thomas Lockhart
• 14:36   Re: Speaking of Indexing... (Text indexing) Mitch Vincent
• 14:49   Postgres & Kerberos Jean-Eric Cuendet
• 15:17   Re: age() function documentation Thomas Lockhart
• 15:26   Re: age() function documentation Peter Eisentraut
• 15:39   Re: age() function documentation Peter Eisentraut
• 15:55   Re: Index type promotion Mark Butler
• 15:56   pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Pascal Scheffers
• 16:12   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 16:17   Re: age() function documentation Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Peter Eisentraut
• 17:15   Re: AW: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Peter Eisentraut
• 19:30   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Lamar Owen
• 19:55   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Oliver Elphick
• 20:01   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Lamar Owen
• 21:08   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Peter Eisentraut
• 21:24   Re: age() function documentation Thomas Lockhart
• 23:35   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Lamar Owen

12 April 2001

• 00:32   Machine down Bruce Momjian
• 00:55   Yacc / Bison difficulties Mark Butler
• 02:31   Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Bruce Momjian
• 03:55   Re: Hand written parsers Mark Butler
• 04:45   Re: Re: Hand written parsers Ian Lance Taylor
• 07:50   Re: Re: Hand written parsers ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 07:50   AW: AW: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:01   Re: age() function documentation Alessio Bragadini
• 11:44   Re: AW: AW: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Thomas Lockhart
• 14:37   Re: age() function documentation Peter Eisentraut
• 15:07   Re: age() function documentation Thomas Lockhart
• 15:15   Re: Call for platforms Patrick Welche
• 15:31   Fwd: Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Robert Schrem
• 16:15   Re: age() function documentation Peter Eisentraut
• 16:22   Re: age() function documentation Peter Eisentraut
• 16:32   Re: AW: AW: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Peter Eisentraut
• 17:12   Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Peter Eisentraut
• 17:35    Howard Williams
• 18:17   Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Mark Butler
• 18:55   Re: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types Mark Butler
• 21:10   Estimating Size of Database Mitesh Shah
• 21:12   Re: Estimating Size of Database Mitch Vincent
• 21:20   Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Peter Eisentraut
• 21:26   RE: Estimating Size of Database Mitesh Shah
• 21:53   Re: RE: Estimating Size of Database Peter Eisentraut

13 April 2001

• 00:19   Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Bruce Momjian
• 01:55   ALTER TABLE MODIFY COLUMN Mark Butler
• 04:16   Re: Truncation of char, varchar types Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: DOUBLE synonym for DOUBLE PRECISION Mark Butler
• 04:38   NUMERIC type efficiency problem Mark Butler
• 04:50   Re: ALTER TABLE MODIFY COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:35   Re: Yacc / Bison difficulties Tom Lane
• 05:36   Re: ALTER TABLE MODIFY COLUMN Tom Lane
• 05:57   Re: NUMERIC type efficiency problem Tom Lane
• 10:04   Re: NUMERIC type efficiency problem Mark Butler
• 10:08   Re: ALTER TABLE MODIFY COLUMN Mark Butler
• 10:08   Re: Re: Hand written parsers Tom Lane
• 10:24   Dump/restore of views containing select distinct fails Peter Eisentraut
• 12:25   Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
• 14:26   Re: NUMERIC type efficiency problem Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: Yellow Dog Linux/PPC regression Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4 Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? Tom Lane
• 16:44   Re: Maybe a plpgsql bug? Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: Call for platforms Patrick Welche
• 17:11   Re: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 17:11   Re: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 17:17   Truncation of object names ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:31   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Tom Lane
• 17:41   Re: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Re: Truncation of object names Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: Truncation of object names ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:27   Re: Truncation of object names Tom Lane
• 19:28   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Pascal Scheffers
• 19:40   Re: Truncation of object names Joel Burton
• 20:07   Re: Truncation of object names ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:09   Re: Truncation of object names Tom Lane
• 20:12   pg_dump problem Olivier PRENANT
• 20:18   Re: Truncation of object names Joel Burton
• 20:25   NUMERIC type benchmarks Mark Butler
• 20:37   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: pg_dump problem Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: Truncation of object names Tom Lane
• 20:47   Tag'd, packaged and ready to go ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:24   Anyone have any good addresses ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 21:34   RE: [BUGS] Problem with 7.0.3 dump -> 7.1b4 restore Rainer Mager
• 21:49   ORDER BY ???? Marcin Wasilewski
• 21:50   Re: Dump/restore of views containing select distinct fails Tom Lane
• 21:57   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 22:06   Languages Marcin Wasilewski
• 22:24   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Kyle VanderBeek
• 22:34   cvs postgres doesn't compile with libreadline 4.2 andrea gelmini
• 22:43   7.1 RPMs Thomas Lockhart
• 23:10   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:37   Re: New benchmark result Mark Butler
• 23:37   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:51   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:55   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:55   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:56   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 23:57   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? Matthew Rice
• 23:57   pg_dump, formats & blobs Mathijs Brands

14 April 2001

• 00:02   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Len Morgan
• 00:03   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 00:10   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 00:15   Re: Tag'd, packaged and ready to go ... Thomas Lockhart
• 00:19   Re: ORDER BY ???? Stephan Szabo
• 00:21   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Bruce Momjian
• 00:27   Re: Anyone have any good addresses ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 00:31   Re: 7.1 RPMs Lamar Owen
• 01:01   NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) Tom Lane
• 01:07   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 01:08   Re: pg_dump, formats & blobs Philip Warner
• 01:09   Re: Re: Tag'd, packaged and ready to go ... Peter Eisentraut
• 01:24   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Peter Eisentraut
• 01:24   Re: pg_dump, formats & blobs Mathijs Brands
• 01:39   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Lamar Owen
• 01:45   Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) Tom Lane
• 02:07   Possible explanation for readline configuration problems Tom Lane
• 02:25   Postmaster fatal defect - pl/pgsql return type conversion Mark Butler
• 02:45   Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems Bruce Momjian
• 02:53   7.1-1 RPMset uploading... Lamar Owen
• 02:53   Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems Tom Lane
• 02:59   Re: Postmaster fatal defect - False alarm Mark Butler
• 03:05   Re: Postmaster fatal defect - pl/pgsql return type conversion Tom Lane
• 05:26   Re: cvs postgres doesn't compile with libreadline 4.2 Tom Lane
• 06:53   Upgrade complete ... all went smooth ... The Hermit Hacker
• 06:59   Re: cvs postgres doesn't compile with libreadline 4.2 Peter Eisentraut
• 07:17   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 07:23   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Tom Lane
• 07:37   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 08:47   Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC Oliver Elphick
• 08:57   Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems Peter Eisentraut
• 10:29   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 12:13   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Philip Warner
• 12:14   Re: pg_dump, formats & blobs Philip Warner
• 13:03   Re: 7.1 RPMs Thomas Lockhart
• 13:30   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Lamar Owen
• 14:33   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 15:41   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs The Hermit Hacker
• 17:15   Name -> number ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:18   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Lamar Owen
• 17:20   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs The Hermit Hacker
• 17:28   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Peter Eisentraut
• 17:30   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Bruce Momjian
• 17:45   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs The Hermit Hacker
• 17:47   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Tom Lane
• 17:47   7.1 RPMS... Chris Bowlby
• 18:06   Re: Name -> number ... Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Peter Eisentraut
• 18:14   Re: Name -> number ... Bruce Momjian
• 18:23   Re: Name -> number ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:25   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Vince Vielhaber
• 18:35   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs The Hermit Hacker
• 18:35   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs The Hermit Hacker
• 18:40   Re: Name -> number ... Tom Lane
• 18:41   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Bruce Momjian
• 19:21   alter database without shutting down !? Sergio A. Kessler
• 20:25   Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 22:10   Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) Tom Lane

15 April 2001

• 00:51   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Peter Eisentraut
• 01:37   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Lamar Owen
• 01:40   Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) Larry Rosenman
• 01:59   Hey guys, check this out. Lamar Owen
• 02:17   Re: Hey guys, check this out. Dominic J. Eidson
• 02:19   Re: Hey guys, check this out. The Hermit Hacker
• 02:39   pg_dump compatibility with 7.0 Philip Warner
• 03:34   Re: Hey guys, check this out. Vince Vielhaber
• 03:36   Re: Hey guys, check this out. The Hermit Hacker
• 04:09   Re: pg_dump compatibility with 7.0 Tom Lane
• 04:17   Fast Forward (fwd) Vince Vielhaber
• 04:39   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Thomas Lockhart
• 04:48   Re: 7.1 RPMs Thomas Lockhart
• 04:51   Re: 7.1 RPMS... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:53   Thankyou! Vince Vielhaber
• 05:25   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Tom Lane
• 05:26   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs The Hermit Hacker
• 05:47   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 05:59   How to do the modular test Werachart Jantarataeme
• 07:46   Re: NUMERIC type benchmarks Mario Weilguni
• 10:42   SQL Sergio Pili
• 12:35   Re: Re: Hand written parsers Bruce Guenter
• 12:54   CRN article Ned Lilly
• 13:22   Re: CRN article The Hermit Hacker
• 13:44   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 14:08   Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs Karl DeBisschop
• 15:23   Re: pg_dump compatibility with 7.0 Philip Warner
• 16:27   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Mitch Vincent
• 16:29   The "Current Release Docs" Mitch Vincent
• 16:50   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
• 17:08   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 17:14   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 23:35   Re: NUMERIC type benchmarks - CORRECTED Mark Butler
• 23:55   Int64 (long long) Supporting Compiler Requirement Status? Mark Butler

16 April 2001

• 00:30   Re: NUMERIC type benchmarks - CORRECTED Tom Lane
• 00:44   Re: Hey guys, check this out. Lincoln Yeoh
• 01:15   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Lamar Owen
• 01:22   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 01:30   Re: Re: Hey guys, check this out. Vince Vielhaber
• 01:35   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 02:24   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 02:27   Re: Int64 (long long) Supporting Compiler Requirement Status? Tom Lane
• 02:37   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 02:47   Re: Fast Forward (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 02:56   Re: Re: Hey guys, check this out. Tom Lane
• 02:58   Re: Re: Hey guys, check this out. ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 03:32   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A with Compaq C T6.4-212 (dtk) Bruce Momjian
• 03:42   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A with Compaq C T6.4-212 (dtk) Thomas Lockhart
• 03:50   Re: How to do the modular test Thomas Lockhart
• 04:22   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A with Compaq C T6.4-212 (dtk) Bruce Momjian
• 07:34   Re: Re: Hey guys, check this out. Lincoln Yeoh
• 07:59   Too many open files in system ryan@paymentalliance.net
• 11:18   Re: Too many open files in system mlw
• 12:40   RE: [BUGS] Problem with 7.0.3 dump -> 7.1b4 restore Rainer Mager
• 12:57   Re: cvs postgres doesn't compile with libreadline 4.2 Juhan-Peep Ernits
• 14:36   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A with Compaq C T6.4-212 (dtk) Thomas Lockhart
• 15:48   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A with Compaq C T6.4-212 (dtk) Tom Lane
• 17:13   7.1 on 7.1 teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 17:22   Re: 7.1 on 7.1 Thomas Lockhart
• 17:24   Re: 7.1 on 7.1 Lamar Owen
• 18:14   integer arrays mlw
• 18:49   Re: integer arrays Tom Lane
• 19:46   No printable 7.1 docs? Christopher Masto
• 19:52   Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Vince Vielhaber

17 April 2001

• 00:05   Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
• 01:20   RE: Truncation of object names Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:32   broken web server? bpalmer
• 01:53   RE: Truncation of object names Mike Mascari
• 03:13   JDBC Select Performance Thomas Hii
• 04:14   re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) matthew green
• 04:23   RedHat/Postgres.pm Error Allan C Huffman
• 04:30   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Christopher Masto
• 07:36   AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:15   Foreign key checks/referential integrity. Gavin Sherry
• 09:23   Re: broken web server? Vince Vielhaber
• 09:31   RE: Foreign key checks/referential integrity. Michael Ansley
• 10:19   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Alessio Bragadini
• 11:27   Talk on Open Source vs Proprietry databases Theo Kramer
• 12:12   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Peter T Mount
• 12:25   Re: RedHat/Postgres.pm Error Alessio Bragadini
• 12:42   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Thomas Lockhart
• 12:44   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Peter T Mount
• 12:48   Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:53   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 14:06   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Tom Lane
• 14:30   AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:34   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Tom Lane
• 15:27   AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:51   AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 16:19   row archiving trigger function Louis-David Mitterrand
• 16:31   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Alessio Bragadini
• 16:34   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Alessio Bragadini
• 16:38   Real/effective user Peter Eisentraut
• 16:40   Another news story in need of 'enlightenment' Lamar Owen
• 16:41   Re: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:46   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Tom Lane
• 16:47   Modified driver to better handle NULL values... Jeroen Habets
• 16:47   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Alessio Bragadini
• 17:02   Re: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 17:08   AW: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 17:10   RE: AW: timeout on lock feature Michael Ansley
• 17:12   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 17:13   Authentication with PGSQL Jean-Eric Cuendet
• 17:13   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
• 17:18   RE: AW: timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:24   Strange behaviour of to_date() Mario Weilguni
• 17:29   Re: Another news story in need of 'enlightenment' ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:29   Re: Real/effective user Tom Lane
• 17:41   RE: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:47   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 7.0.3 to compile on Tru64 UNIX v5.0A Tom Lane
• 18:38   SV: Foreign key checks/referential integrity. Jarmo Paavilainen
• 18:50   Re: Authentication with PGSQL Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: 7.1 on 7.1 teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:12   Foolish question about <<<< SELECT INTO rec xxx, xxxx, xxx, xxx WHERE YYYYYY ilike %$2 >>>> Jean-Michel POURE
• 20:01   Re: Foolish question about <<<< SELECT INTO rec xxx, xxxx, xxx, xxx WHERE YYYYYY ilike %$2 >>>> Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: timeout on lock feature ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:00   Re: [BUGS] three VERY minor things with 7.1 final Tom Lane
• 23:00   plpgsql problem Lehel Gyuro
• 23:01   Re: timeout on lock feature Henryk Szal
• 23:07   Handling error messages Víctor R. Ruiz
• 23:18   Re: timeout on lock feature Henryk Szal
• 23:29   Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) Kyle VanderBeek
• 23:33   doubts Francisco Alvarez
• 23:44   Re: Re: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane

18 April 2001

• 00:00   Re: Re: timeout on lock feature Ian Lance Taylor
• 00:06   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:22   Re: Re: [BUGS] three VERY minor things with 7.1 final The Hermit Hacker
• 02:29   [BUG] views and functions on relations Alex Pilosov
• 03:31   Re: plpgsql problem Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: timeout on lock feature Theo Kramer
• 03:48   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:54   Re: plpgsql problem Stephan Szabo
• 04:57   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
• 05:07   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Tom Lane
• 07:34   AW: Re: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:35   AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:28   Re: Another news story in need of 'enlightenment' darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 08:35   AW: [BUG] views and functions on relations Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:39   Re: Strange behaviour of to_date() Karel Zak
• 11:20   Re: Another news story in need of 'enlightenment' The Hermit Hacker
• 12:17   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:06   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
• 13:37   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Tom Lane
• 15:09   AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:58   theory of distributed transactions / timeouts Oliver Seidel
• 15:59   RE: AW: timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:04   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Alex Pilosov
• 16:18   Re: [PATCHES] Fix for psql core dumping on bad user Peter Eisentraut
• 16:23   [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Joel Burton
• 16:23   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Alex Pilosov
• 17:22   CRN article not updated Bruce Momjian
• 17:25   problems with corrupted db on v7.0.3 on linux 2.2.x P. A. Bagyenda
• 18:24   Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Tom Lane
• 18:24   RE: AW: timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:39   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Bruce Momjian
• 18:44   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 18:44   Re: Real/effective user Peter Eisentraut
• 19:09   Re: Modified driver to better handle NULL values...y Bruce Momjian
• 19:21   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:22   Re: Another news story in need of 'enlightenment' Bruce Momjian
• 19:31   Re: AW: timeout on lock featurey Bruce Momjian
• 19:40   Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Tom Lane
• 19:48   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?y Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Joel Burton
• 20:24   Re: CRN article not updated ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:48   Re: timeout on lock feature ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:29   Re: CRN article not updated Mitch Vincent
• 22:33   Re: timeout on lock featurey Bruce Momjian

19 April 2001

• 00:09   Re: timeout on lock feature ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 00:30   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Alex Pilosov
• 00:39   Re: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 00:41   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for psql core dumping on bad user Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:41   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:01   Re: timeout on lock feature ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 01:02   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Tom Lane
• 01:10   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?y Bruce Momjian
• 01:10   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Tom Lane
• 01:29   Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Philip Warner
• 01:31   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Philip Warner
• 01:48   Re: [BUG] views and functions on relations Tom Lane
• 01:52   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:56   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
• 08:29   AW: timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:04   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Vince Vielhaber
• 11:57   idle processes in v7.1 ... not killable? The Hermit Hacker
• 12:46   get difference between two timestamp value in second? Sergiy Ovcharuk
• 12:48   Re: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Henryk Szal
• 12:49   Re: AW: timeout on lock feature Henryk Szal
• 12:53   Ethical HH Opensoft.ca
• 12:55   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Jan Wieck
• 13:01   Re: Strange behaviour of to_date() Mario Weilguni
• 13:07   Corrupt database log?? P. A. Bagyenda
• 13:07   RE: [BUGS] Problem with 7.0.3 dump -> 7.1b4 restore Rainer Mager
• 13:13   Re: Corrupt database log?? P. A. Bagyenda
• 13:13   Re: Re: timeout on lock feature Henryk Szal
• 13:43   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Philip Warner
• 14:53   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:03   Re: get difference between two timestamp value in second? Thomas Lockhart
• 15:12   Re: Re: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
• 15:20   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
• 16:22   Some notes on whole-tuple function parameters Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Joel Burton
• 16:51   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Joel Burton
• 16:55   Re: Re: Re: timeout on lock feature Ian Lance Taylor
• 17:29   CVS server ailing? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:40   Re: idle processes in v7.1 ... not killable? Tom Lane
• 17:41   Re: idle processes in v7.1 ... not killable? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:15   System catalog representation of access privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 18:46   Postgresql, HA ?, Monitoring. V. M.
• 18:54   Re: CVS server ailing? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:19   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Mike Mascari
• 19:25   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:39   Re: Re: [BUGS] three VERY minor things with 7.1 final Peter Eisentraut
• 20:14   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 21:09   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Tom Lane
• 21:21   Re: Postgresql, HA ?, Monitoring. Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Mike Mascari
• 21:54   RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2y Bruce Momjian
• 22:10   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2y Tom Lane
• 23:59   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane

20 April 2001

• 00:01   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Philip Warner
• 00:03   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Philip Warner
• 00:08   Including libpq++.h Greg Hulands
• 00:14   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 00:19   Re: Including libpq++.h Tom Lane
• 00:36   Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:57   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Philip Warner
• 01:28   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 08:58   AW: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:17   Re: AW: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:21   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 14:46   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Jan Wieck
• 15:29   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Philip Warner
• 15:35   Re: System catalog representation of access privileges Tom Lane
• 15:45   Hardcopy docs available Thomas Lockhart
• 15:57   Docs on web site Thomas Lockhart
• 16:16   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Joel Burton
• 16:25   Re: Docs on web site Vince Vielhaber
• 16:29   Re: Hardcopy docs available Bruce Momjian
• 17:06   Re: Hardcopy docs available Ken Hirsch
• 17:52   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Bruce Momjian
• 18:03   Re: Hardcopy docs available Bruce Momjian
• 18:16   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Bruce Momjian
• 19:50   Re: Docs on web site Thomas Lockhart
• 21:30   Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? G. Anthony Reina
• 21:56   Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:16   Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? Bruce Momjian
• 22:34   Re: Hardcopy docs available Ken Hirsch
• 22:50   Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? G. Anthony Reina

21 April 2001

• 00:20   Re: Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 00:37   Re: Hardcopy docs available Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:46   Re: Hardcopy docs available Thomas Lockhart
• 00:46   Re: Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? Ryan Mahoney
• 00:52   Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? Thomas Lockhart
• 09:46   Re: Re: Is it possible to mirror the db in Postgres? Hannu Krosing
• 13:53   setuid(geteuid());? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:08   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 15:30   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Tom Lane
• 15:52   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 15:58   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Tom Lane
• 16:06   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:09   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 16:29   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Tom Lane
• 17:02   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:58   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 18:58   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 19:32   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian
• 19:42   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:53   Re: setuid(geteuid());? Bruce Momjian

22 April 2001

• 02:10   well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support Paul A Vixie
• 02:28   Re: well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support Paul A Vixie
• 04:30   SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION (was Re: Real/effective user) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:04   Re: Hardcopy docs available Thomas Lockhart
• 17:17   Re: Re: Call for platforms Patrick Welche
• 20:55   Replication through WAL Chad La Joie

23 April 2001

• 00:21   Re: Replication through WAL Bruce Momjian
• 04:01   Compiler warning (V7.1 plpgsql) Yasuo Ohgaki
• 05:14   How to determine if a user exists.. Dominic J. Eidson
• 05:26   pg_statistic Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:56   Re: SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION (was Re: Real/effective user) Karel Zak
• 09:34   AW: AW: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:55   Re: Replication through WAL Chad La Joie
• 11:33   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Philip Warner
• 11:38   Will something bad happen if I put index on xmin ? Hannu Krosing
• 11:55   7.2 feature request Chad La Joie
• 12:06   Re: How to determine if a user exists.. Joel Burton
• 12:43   Re: How to determine if a user exists.. Dominic J. Eidson
• 12:53   Re: pg_statistic Tom Lane
• 12:53   Re: Will something bad happen if I put index on xmin ? Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: How to determine if a user exists.. Dominic J. Eidson
• 13:46   Re: Re: Replication through WAL Bruce Momjian
• 13:57   Re: How to determine if a user exists.. Tom Lane
• 14:04   row name length Adam Rose
• 14:04   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: Re: How to determine if a user exists.. Peter Eisentraut
• 14:37   Re: row name length Peter Eisentraut
• 14:40   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Hannu Krosing
• 15:18   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Philip Warner
• 15:36   Re: row name length Adam Rose
• 15:55   concurrent Postgres on NUMA - howto ? Mauricio Breternitz
• 16:09   book I found Bruce Momjian
• 16:16   Look what book I found Bruce Momjian
• 16:34   Re: row name length Adam Rose
• 17:04   Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2 Jan Wieck
• 17:10   refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:11   Re: refusing connections based on load ... ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:43   RI oddness Jan Wieck
• 18:48   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Jan Wieck
• 20:09   Re: SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION (was Re: Real/effective user) Peter Eisentraut
• 22:51   Re: concurrent Postgres on NUMA - howto ? Tom Lane
• 22:59   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane

24 April 2001

• 00:03   Re: Hardcopy docs available Thomas Lockhart
• 00:16   Re: Re: Hardcopy docs available Vince Vielhaber
• 01:35   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:42   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Larry Rosenman
• 01:50   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 01:51   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Larry Rosenman
• 02:12   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Larry Rosenman
• 02:21   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 03:03   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Ian Lance Taylor
• 03:23   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:26   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:38   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Lincoln Yeoh
• 03:54   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Doug McNaught
• 03:58   start / stop scripts question Rachit Siamwalla
• 04:01   Re: refusing connections based on load ... ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 04:20   ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "JOIN" Fernando Nasser
• 05:03   Re: Re: refusing connections based on load ... ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 05:26   pg_dump & 7.0 Philip Warner
• 07:36   Re: Look what book I found Hannu Krosing
• 11:06   OUTER JOIN vs UNION ... faster? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:34   Re: RI oddness Max Khon
• 13:01   Re: concurrent Postgres on NUMA - howto ? Mauricio Breternitz
• 13:28   Re: start / stop scripts question Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:29   Re: OUTER JOIN vs UNION ... faster? Thomas Lockhart
• 16:56   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:16   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Jan Wieck
• 18:02   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Peter Eisentraut
• 19:28   Re: RI oddness Jan Wieck
• 19:47   RE: start / stop scripts question Rachit Siamwalla
• 20:05   Re: start / stop scripts question Bruce Momjian
• 20:26   Re: start / stop scripts question Lamar Owen

25 April 2001

• 00:01   pg_dump Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:05   Re: pg_dump Philip Warner
• 01:05   Re: Re: refusing connections based on load ... Lincoln Yeoh
• 01:28   Re: Re: Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:16   Re: pg_dump Philip Warner
• 04:14   Re: Re: Re: refusing connections based on load ... Lincoln Yeoh
• 04:36   Re: refusing connections based on load ... ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 09:35   Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Mike Mascari
• 11:15   Comment about PostgreSQL on Epinions.com Alessio Bragadini
• 11:29   Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore Philip Warner
• 11:42   Re: Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 11:56   Re: Comment about PostgreSQL on Epinions.com Vince Vielhaber
• 14:23   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Christopher Masto
• 14:48   Re: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "JOIN" Tom Lane
• 15:25   Re: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "JOIN" Fernando Nasser
• 15:42   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Tom Lane
• 16:10   Re: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "JOIN" Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Joel Burton
• 16:32   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Peter Eisentraut
• 18:05   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:34   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 19:27   Re: concurrent Postgres on NUMA - howto ? Tom Lane
• 19:36   Cursor support in pl/pg ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:43   tables/indexes/logs on different volumes ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:46   Re: Cursor support in pl/pg Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Jan Wieck
• 20:19   Re: Cursor support in pl/pg Jan Wieck
• 20:21   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Joel Burton
• 20:31   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 20:32   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:29   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Vince Vielhaber
• 23:40   Schema Issue V. M.
• 23:58   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker

26 April 2001

• 00:00   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 00:29   Open source is great, but too tempting mlw
• 05:43   Re: Cursor support in pl/pg Ian Lance Taylor
• 07:38   Important news about PgAdmin >>>> Drop/create functions, triggers and views and relink the whole system without restarting PostgreSQL Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:37   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Vince Vielhaber
• 10:45   Re: refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
• 10:56   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Vince Vielhaber
• 11:43   concurrent postgres in NUMA cluster postgres - design OK ? Mauricio Breternitz
• 11:50   scaling multiple connections mlw
• 12:10   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Len Morgan
• 12:20   pg_log file corrupted YekFu.Wong@seagate.com
• 12:31   ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "JOIN" Fernando Nasser
• 12:41   Re: refusing connections based on load ... August Zajonc
• 12:54   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Neal Norwitz
• 13:14   Re: Cursor support in pl/pg Jan Wieck
• 13:27   Re: refusing connections based on load ... Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Hardcopy docs available Vince Vielhaber
• 14:29   Re: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "JOIN" Fernando Nasser
• 14:52   unanswered: Schema Issue V. M.
• 15:22   Re: RI oddness Jan Wieck
• 15:26   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Hardcopy docs available Vince Vielhaber
• 15:41   Re: scaling multiple connections Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Hardcopy docs available Thomas Lockhart
• 16:30   applications hang when calling 'vacuum' Barnes, Sandy (Sandra)
• 16:42   Re: RI oddness Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: unanswered: Schema Issue Joel Burton
• 17:14   Re: Cursor support in pl/pg Ian Lance Taylor
• 17:18   Re: scaling multiple connections mlw
• 17:31   Re: unanswered: Schema Issue V. M.
• 17:38   Re: RI oddness Jan Wieck
• 17:43   Re: unanswered: Schema Issue Joel Burton
• 17:47   Re: Cursor support in pl/pg Jan Wieck
• 18:19   Re: Re: unanswered: Schema Issue V. M.
• 18:53   status after 7.1 and pgcrypto update / crypt(table.field) ? Marko Kreen
• 19:24   Re: Re: unanswered: Schema Issue V. M.
• 19:27   Re: Re: unanswered: Schema Issue Joel Burton
• 20:13   zpbit_in does not receive correct atttypmod Peter Eisentraut
• 21:25   Re: status after 7.1 and pgcrypto update / crypt(table.field) ? Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: zpbit_in does not receive correct atttypmod Tom Lane
• 22:37   PAM Authentication for PostgreSQL... Dominic J. Eidson
• 23:02   Re: PAM Authentication for PostgreSQL... Thomas Lockhart

27 April 2001

• 02:22   Re: applications hang when calling 'vacuum' Denis Perchine
• 03:08   7.1 startup recovery failure Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:12   7.1 vacuum Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 03:19   Re: 7.1 startup recovery failure Vadim Mikheev
• 05:54   Re: 7.1 vacuum Alfred Perlstein
• 09:23   Re: scaling multiple connections Lincoln Yeoh
• 09:41   AW: Re: scaling multiple connections Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:23   Re: 7.1 startup recovery failure Tom Lane
• 12:27   Re: 7.1 vacuum mlw
• 12:27   Re: 7.1 vacuum Alfred Perlstein
• 14:55   Re: Re: 7.1 vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   RE: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Mike Mascari
• 15:21   Archived redo logs / Managed recovery mode? Matthew Kirkwood
• 15:57   The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives The Hermit Hacker
• 16:06   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Vince Vielhaber
• 16:14   RE: 7.1 startup recovery failure Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:15   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Vince Vielhaber
• 16:23   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives The Hermit Hacker
• 16:25   Re: Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Oleg Bartunov
• 16:37   While we're on the subject of searches... Vince Vielhaber
• 16:46   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Oleg Bartunov
• 17:01   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Bruce Momjian
• 17:03   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives The Hermit Hacker
• 17:42   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Bruce Momjian
• 18:04   v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:17   Split of tree on May 1 Bruce Momjian
• 18:20   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives The Hermit Hacker
• 18:42   RE: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:49   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... bpalmer
• 19:11   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Jan Wieck
• 19:55   RE: Re: 7.1 vacuum Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:07   Re: While we're on the subject of searches... Vince Vielhaber
• 20:11   WAL feature Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   `make depend' broken in CVS sources Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:35   Re: `make depend' broken in CVS sources Peter Eisentraut
• 20:47   RE: WAL feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:51   pg_dump Backup on 7.0.3 - Sanity error? G. Anthony Reina
• 20:58   Re: WAL feature The Hermit Hacker
• 20:59   Re: Split of tree on May 1 The Hermit Hacker
• 21:16   Re: WAL feature Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   RE: WAL feature The Hermit Hacker
• 22:15   Re: WAL feature The Hermit Hacker
• 22:20   Re: WAL feature Bruce Momjian
• 23:20   RE: WAL feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:33   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Thomas Lockhart
• 23:41   RE: WAL feature The Hermit Hacker
• 23:41   RE: WAL feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:44   Re: WAL feature Bruce Momjian

28 April 2001

• 00:04   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Thomas Lockhart
• 00:28   Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Lincoln Yeoh
• 00:45   Re: Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives Bruce Momjian
• 00:49   Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Thomas Lockhart
• 01:25   Informix? Thomas Lockhart
• 02:45   Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION Ian Lance Taylor
• 05:10   RE: Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Mike Mascari
• 11:16   WAL performance with wal_sync_method = open_sync Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:55   Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION Roberto Mello
• 16:24   SAPDB Open Souce Matthew
• 18:20   RE:PAM Authentication for PostgreSQL... Ryan M. Hager
• 18:20   Re: While we're on the subject of searches... Brook Milligan
• 18:29   Re: WAL feature Sergey E. Volkov
• 18:30   after changing login password (local), CPU always 100% !! ÆøÇò
• 20:51   Struggling with c functions Olivier PRENANT
• 21:15   PQftype() Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 21:30   Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Peter Eisentraut
• 21:45   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION Bruce Momjian

29 April 2001

• 00:19   Re: Struggling with c functions mlw
• 01:14   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Gavin Sherry
• 01:34   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Bruce Momjian
• 03:29   SAP-DB Don Baccus
• 03:30   Building Fault Tolerant/Failover PGSQL Systems special agent "k
• 03:41   Re: SAP-DB Matthew N. Dodd
• 04:23   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Horst Herb
• 07:15   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Kaare Rasmussen
• 07:26   Re: [PATCHES] Cyrillic to UNICODE conversion Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:33   SAP DB Featuers Kaare Rasmussen
• 07:39   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Andrew McMillan
• 09:10   Re: Struggling with c functions Olivier PRENANT
• 09:49   Re: [PATCHES] Cyrillic to UNICODE conversion Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:02   Re: Building Fault Tolerant/Failover PGSQL Systems darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 14:22   Self vacuuming Alastair D'Silva
• 14:33   Re: Self vacuuming mlw
• 15:30   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: SAP DB Featuers Bruce Momjian
• 16:07   Re: SAP-DB mlw
• 16:28   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION Roberto Mello
• 16:37   Re: Re: SAP-DB Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   Re: SAP-DB Bruce Momjian
• 17:12   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Bruce Momjian
• 17:36   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Bruce Momjian
• 18:49   Re: Re: SAP-DB Alfred Perlstein
• 18:58   Learning from other open source databases Bruce Momjian
• 22:38   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION Bruce Momjian

30 April 2001

• 01:18   Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Casey Lyon
• 01:35   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 01:40   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() The Hermit Hacker
• 01:44   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 01:51   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 01:56   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() The Hermit Hacker
• 02:00   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() The Hermit Hacker
• 02:12   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Alfred Perlstein
• 02:21   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() The Hermit Hacker
• 02:25   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() B. Palmer
• 02:28   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 02:32   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Casey Lyon
• 02:40   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Casey Lyon
• 02:42   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() The Hermit Hacker
• 02:49   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Serguei Mokhov
• 02:51   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 02:52   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Casey Lyon
• 03:05   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: pg_dump Backup on 7.0.3 - Sanity error? Tom Lane
• 03:32   Re: PQftype() Tom Lane
• 03:32   Re: 7.1 startup recovery failure Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:37   v7.1 error ... SELECT converted to a COPY? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:54   Re: v7.1 error ... SELECT converted to a COPY? Tom Lane
• 03:58   Re: v7.1 error ... SELECT converted to a COPY? The Hermit Hacker
• 04:25   Re: `make depend' broken in CVS sources Tom Lane
• 04:58   Re: WAL performance with wal_sync_method = open_sync Tom Lane
• 05:08   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Tom Lane
• 05:17   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Alfred Perlstein
• 08:36   COPY commands could use an enhancement. Alfred Perlstein
• 09:03   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Vince Vielhaber
• 09:59   Re: Learning from other open source databases Ken Hirsch
• 11:52   Bug in ODBC driver Jan Wieck
• 13:08   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Joel Burton
• 13:21   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Alfred Perlstein
• 14:10   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Thomas Lockhart
• 14:44   Re: SAPDB Open Souce Jan Wieck
• 14:51   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Bruce Momjian
• 15:53   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Peter Eisentraut
• 15:53   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Alfred Perlstein
• 16:26   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Bruce Momjian
• 16:30   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Fernando Nasser
• 16:48   Re: pg_dump Backup on 7.0.3 - Sanity error? G. Anthony Reina
• 18:24   Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Thomas Lockhart
• 18:25   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Thomas Lockhart
• 21:07   Re: PQftype() Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 21:15   Re: PQftype() Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 21:24   Re: PQftype() Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: COPY commands could use an enhancement. Joel Burton
• 21:49   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Bruce Momjian
• 22:23   Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... Tom Lane
• 22:56   Re: Bug in ODBC driver Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:52   date conversion (was Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...) Tom Lane