Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()
Date
Msg-id 200104300251.f3U2pMM08848@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > 
> > doesn't this defeat the reasons for going to numerics?  is there a reason
> > why its such a difficult thing to do a SELECT oid on pg_database and
> > pg_class to get this information?  that's what I've been doing when I need
> > to know *shrug*
> 
> Yes, but you can't do that if you can't start the database or can't
> connect for some reason.  If people don't think it is worthwhile, we can
> delete the TODO item.
> 
> For example, when someone has trouble figuring out which directory is
> which database, they can just ls and look at the symlinks.  Seems like a
> nice feature.

I will admit we are not getting flooded with problems due to the new
numeric file names like I thought we would, so maybe it is not worth the
symlinks.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()