Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyle VanderBeek
Subject Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack)
Date
Msg-id 20010417112927.V30314@yaga.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack)  (Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:11:54AM -0400, Peter T Mount wrote:
> Erm, int8 isn't long, but an array of 8 int's (unless it's changed).

http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/datatype.htm#AEN942

It is very much an 8-byte integer, the correlary to Java's Long/long.

--
Kyle.
   "I hate every ape I see, from chimpan-A to chimpan-Z" -- Troy McClure

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Henryk Szal"
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout on lock feature
Next
From: "Francisco Alvarez"
Date:
Subject: doubts