Re: Hardcopy docs available - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ken Hirsch
Subject Re: Hardcopy docs available
Date
Msg-id 006701c0c9c4$8f559ee0$47863dd0@computer
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardcopy docs available  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Hardcopy docs available  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
There may be a better way to create PDF files if you have TeX.  See
http://www.tug.org/applications/jadetex/

I haven't used Jade, so I don't know, but the PDF files that are output by
pdftex and pdflatex are smaller than those created by ps2pdf and easier to
read on your monitor (I think because they use the built-in PDF fonts where
they can.)

Ken Hirsch
All your database are belong to us

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
<pgsql-announce@postgresql.org>; <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs available


> > Can someone generate PDF versions of these? Sorry I can't remember all
> > those who volunteered, so perhaps we should coordinate on the -hackers
> > list so folks don't duplicate work. Thanks!
>
> If you have Postscript, does ps2pdf do anything useful for you?  The
> issue is that the site that generated the Postscript should be the one
> who generates the PDF because the font metrics use to generate the
> Postscript should be the same as the fonts embedded in the PDF file.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardcopy docs available
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2