Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4)
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20010414114302.00ccf1d0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4)  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 21:15 13/04/01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> At 17:34 13/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >
>> >A possible kluge answer is to make pg_dump's OID-ordering of views
>> >depend on the OID of the view rule rather than the view relation.
>> >I am not sure if that would break any cases that work now, however.
>> >
>> 
>> This seems good to me; it should be based on the 'oid of the view', and
>> AFAICT, the rule OID should be it. Should I do this?
>
>The view oid is certainly better than the base relation oid.
>

Since I'm in pg_dump at the moment, I'll make the change...



----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing)
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump, formats & blobs