Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...
Date
Msg-id 3AEDA7DE.FC815C9A@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses date conversion (was Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...)
List pgsql-hackers
> Thomas, what do you think of the persistent reports of date conversion
> problems at DST boundaries, eg, Ayal Leibowitz's report today in
> pgsql-bugs?  I cannot reproduce any such problem --- and my local
> timezone database claims that MET DST transitions are the last week of
> March, never the first week of April, anyway.  There's something funny
> going on there.

Yes. I tried the example on 7.0.2 (and 7.1) and could not get it to
misbehave. I was guessing that it involves string->date conversion,
which may pass through timestamp to get there, but it looks like there
is an explicit text->date conversion function so time zone should just
never be involved. Really!
                  - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "G. Anthony Reina"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump Backup on 7.0.3 - Sanity error?
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...