At 03:44 PM 27-04-2001 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >
>> > Huh? *raised eyebrow* This is a standalone application that they've
>> > donated to the project ... nothing that can be added to any of our
>> > distributions ...
>>
>> Isn't the text indexing something that can go into the distribution?
>
>to the best of my knowledge, everything they had for public consumption
>was added to v7.1, but Oleg would be better for that ... to get
>fts.postgresql.org, there was nothing special I had to do as far as the
>backend was concerned *shrug*
<featurerequest>
Well if stuff like that ends up in Postgresql would it be possible to index
LIKE '%xxx%' searches? That way all people have to do is create the
relevant index and use a fts_ops or something, and voila LIKE '%xxx%'
searches become faster, with maybe some performance+disk space hit for
inserts.
Would something like that be difficult to implement? I'm not sure how
function+fts index would work either.
I hope FTS for postgresql doesn't start looking like Oracle's
Context/Intermedia... Proprietary interfaces == "lock in" == "ick".
</featurerequest>
Cheerio,
Link.
