Re: Call for platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Call for platforms
Date
Msg-id 3ACD5438.793E838@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for platforms  ("Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>)
Responses Re: Re: Call for platforms  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bottom line:  7.1RC1 passes most of the regression tests on
> NetBSD/macppc.  It's probably good enough for normal use since the
> differences are not extensive, but someone would need to look at the
> diff's for longer than the 10 seconds or so I've spent so far, and
> someone should actually set it up for real use to check that.

I'll mark it as supported; the horology diffs are not significant and
geometry is known to be a bit different on some platforms.

Including the not-tested-for-7.1 NetBSD/m68k, we are supported on 30
platforms for the upcoming release, with definite potential for a couple
of more (QNX and Ultrix).

*That* is some sort of milestone! :))
                   - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms