On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
> > > lots of traffic.
> >
> > The traffic naturally peaks around release time, and this time
> > especially because yours truly messed up the whole build system that
> > the packagers were so careful to work around. I trust that in a few
> > weeks we'll enter a new quiet period. My vote is that technical
> > packaging discussions should go on -hackers just like a makefile
> > discussion.
>
> Why not a "pgsql-build", or something like that, list? Where build/make
> file discussions can take place? Vs server issues? I'd really like to
> find some way of reducing traffic on -hackers like we did with -interfaces
> ... if we can come up with a good list for it ...
>
> pgsql-build (or a better name?) could be for RPM discussions, just as easy
> as Makefile/Configure discussions ...
How 'bout pgsql-hackers-rpm. Because the make/config stuff can impact
so many different parts of PostgreSQL, that stuff should probably remain
on hackers.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore
http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
